Literature DB >> 14763468

Comparison of four corneal pachymetry technique;s in corneal refractive surgery.

Jaime Javaloy1, Maria Teresa Vidal, Jose R Villada, Alberto Artola, Jorge L Alió.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of optical and ultrasonic pachymetry when examining corneas of patients before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 25 patients (50 eyes) who had LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism (mean spherical equivalent refraction -4.80 +/- 3.60 D; range -1.75 to -12.00 D). Corneal thickness was measured using 1) conventional ultrasonic pachymetry (20 MHz probe) in the central cornea, 2) ASL confocal microscopy (CMTF analysis), 3) Orbscan II Analyzer, and 4) ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) (50 MHz probe) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Preoperative pachymetry values measured with the Orbscan II Analyzer (551.3 +/- 27.3 microm) were almost identical to those measured with the 20 MHz ultrasonic probe (553.7 +/- 25.7 microm; t-test P = .652). The mean preoperative pachymetry for UBM was 566.7 +/- 38.8 microm and for CMTF was 553.2 +/- 15.5 microm. The optic and ultrasonic system measurements differed in operated eyes; 20 MHz ultrasonic pachymetry yielded an average 478.7 +/- 23.5 microm and the UBM, 482.4 +/- 40.3 microm. These measurements differed from the Orbscan II (Tukey test; P = .023) measurement of 461.1 +/- 37.5 microm but not from the confocal microscopy measurement of 475.2 +/- 41.8 microm. UBM registered greater values that were more variable than those obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry.
CONCLUSIONS: In non-operated eyes, corneal thickness was similar using conventional ultrasound, Orbscan II, or confocal techniques, with ultrasound biomicroscopy giving thicker readings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14763468     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20040101-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  5 in total

1.  Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Yong-Heng Luo; Qian Zhong; Ping-Bo Ouyang; Xiao-Jian Guo; Xuan-Chu Duan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Clinical applications of corneal confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Mitra Tavakoli; Parwez Hossain; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06

3.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  Saleh Al-Ageel; Abdulrahman M Al-Muammar
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-24

4.  Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Jorge A Calvo-Sanz; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Miguel A Sánchez-Tena
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-02-21

5.  Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Contact and Non-contact Pachymetry Devices.

Authors:  Huseyin Mayali; Muhammed Altinisik; Ismail Diri; Sami Ilker; Emin Kurt; Ozcan Kayikcioglu
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2021 Jan-Apr
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.