Literature DB >> 14759107

Influence of bone invasion and extent of mandibular resection on local control of cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

C J O'Brien1, J R Adams, E B McNeil, P Taylor, P Laniewski, A Clifford, G D Parker.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the influence of bone invasion on treatment outcome among patients with cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx and to determine whether or not outcome was influenced by the extent of mandibular resection. A review of 127 prospectively documented patients who were treated with marginal or segmental resection for oral (n = 110) and oropharyngeal (n = 17) cancers was undertaken. There were 97 males and 30 females with a median age of 61 years. Clinical T stages were: T1 17 patients, T2 33, T3 22, T4 55. Median followup was 4 years. A total of 94 patients underwent marginal resections and 33 underwent segmental resections. Histological bone invasion was present in 17 patients (16%) in the marginal resection group and 21 patients (64%) in the segmental group (P<0.05). Soft tissue surgical margins were positive in 11 patients (12%) in the marginal group and in seven patients (21%) in the segmental group (P=not significant). Local control did not correlate significantly with T stage, the extent of mandibular resection or the presence of histological bone invasion, but was significantly influenced by positive soft tissue margins (P<0.01). Among patients with bone invasion, the local control rate was higher following segmental resection when compared to marginal resections (87% vs 75%) but this was not statistically significant. Survival was significantly influenced by positive soft tissue margins but not bone invasion or the type of resection. We conclude that bone invasion alone did not predict for local control or survival rates among patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancers. Involved soft tissue margins were highly predictive of local recurrence and decreased survival. Conservative resection of the mandible is safe as long as marginal mandibulectomy does not lead to compromise of soft tissue margins. Segmental resection should be reserved for patients extensive bone invasion or those with limited invasion in a thin atrophic mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14759107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ken Omura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  [Surgical treatment options in oropharyngeal cancer].

Authors:  Herwig Swoboda
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

3.  The role of tumor invasion into the mandible of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Mücke; Frank Hölzle; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Marco Kesting
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Joo; Jae-Keun Cho; Bon Seok Koo; Minsu Kwon; Seong Keun Kwon; Soon Young Kwon; Min-Su Kim; Jeong Kyu Kim; Heejin Kim; Innchul Nam; Jong-Lyel Roh; Young Min Park; Il-Seok Park; Jung Je Park; Sung-Chan Shin; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Seongjun Won; Chang Hwan Ryu; Tae Mi Yoon; Giljoon Lee; Doh Young Lee; Myung-Chul Lee; Joon Kyoo Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Jae-Yol Lim; Jae Won Chang; Jeon Yeob Jang; Man Ki Chung; Yuh-Seok Jung; Jae-Gu Cho; Yoon Seok Choi; Jeong-Seok Choi; Guk Haeng Lee; Phil-Sang Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  [On the indications for and morbidity of segmental resection of the mandible for squamous cell carcinoma in the lower oral cavity].

Authors:  A Abler; M Roser; D Weingart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-05

6.  Influence of bone invasion on outcomes after marginal mandibulectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Ivana Petrovic; Pablo H Montero; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Frank L Palmer; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Jatin P Shah
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  The diagnosis and treatment of oral cavity cancer.

Authors:  Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Markus Follmann; Alexander Nast
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  [Squamous cell carcinoma as the most common oral carcinoma. Diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  G Balakirski; F Hölzle; M Megahed
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.751

9.  Loss of MMP-27 Predicts Mandibular Bone Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonas Eichberger; Florian Weber; Gerrit Spanier; Michael Gerken; Stephan Schreml; Daniela Schulz; Mathias Fiedler; Nils Ludwig; Richard Josef Bauer; Torsten Eugen Reichert; Tobias Ettl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Priority of fibular reconstruction in patients with oral cavity cancer undergoing segmental mandibulectomy.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Lin; Chung-Jan Kang; Chung-Kan Tsao; Christopher Glenn Wallace; Li-Yu Lee; Chien-Yu Lin; Hung-Ming Wang; Shu-Hang Ng; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chun-Ta Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.