Literature DB >> 28011180

Influence of bone invasion on outcomes after marginal mandibulectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Ivana Petrovic1, Pablo H Montero1, Jocelyn C Migliacci1, Frank L Palmer1, Ian Ganly1, Snehal G Patel1, Jatin P Shah2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Marginal mandibulectomy (MM) is indicated for oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OCSCC) that abut or minimally erode the mandible without gross invasion. Successful implementation of MM is predicated on accurate patient selection and appropriate adjuvant treatment based on well-known host and tumor characteristics. The incidence of microscopically diagnosed bone involvement in MM specimens and its implications on outcomes have however not been reported in large contemporary series.
PURPOSE: To report the incidence of bone involvement and analyze its influence on oncologic outcomes in selected patients who underwent MM in treatment of OCSCC.
METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed on a consecutive series of previously untreated patients requiring MM, at a tertiary care cancer center, between 1985 and 2012 (n = 326). The median age was 64 years and 59% were male. The majority of patients (67%) had a primary tumor of the floor of the mouth or lower alveolus, 80% were clinically staged T1-2, and 31% were clinically N+. Postoperative radiation (PORT) was used in 27% and chemoradiation (POCTRT) in 8% of patients who had microscopic bone invasion. The median follow up period was 55 months and endpoints of interest were local and regional recurrence free (LRFS and RRFS) and disease specific (DSS) survival.
RESULTS: Microscopic bone invasion was present in 15% of patients (n = 49). Among these, cortical invasion was present in 32, medullary in 13, and it was not specified in 4. Eight patients had microscopic positive bone margins. Positive bone margins were associated with medullary bone involvement (p < 0.001), floor of mouth and buccal mucosa primary site (p = 0.03), and positive soft tissue margins (p = 0.06). LRFS and DSS were similar in patients without versus with bone invasion (62.8% vs 79.7% and 76.2% vs 66% respectively, p = NS). LRFS were similar in patients with microscopic positive versus negative bone margins, as long as postoperative adjuvant treatment was administered.
CONCLUSION: Microscopic bone involvement does not adversely influence outcomes but medullary bone involvement does confer a higher risk of positive bone margins. MM and appropriate adjuvant treatment is an effective strategy for treatment of OCSCC in selected patients with primary tumors adherent to or in proximity to the mandible.
Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone invasion; Marginal mandibulectomy; Oncologic outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011180      PMCID: PMC5293664          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  13 in total

1.  The role of marginal mandibulectomy in the surgical management of oral cancer.

Authors:  Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-05

Review 2.  Marginal mandibulectomy vs segmental mandibulectomy: indications and controversies.

Authors:  Mark K Wax; Daphne A Bascom; Larry L Myers
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-05

3.  Influence of bone invasion and extent of mandibular resection on local control of cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

Authors:  C J O'Brien; J R Adams; E B McNeil; P Taylor; P Laniewski; A Clifford; G D Parker
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical aspects.

Authors:  H Müller; P J Slootweg
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Mandible preservation with oral cavity carcinoma: rim mandibulectomy versus sagittal mandibulectomy.

Authors:  S W Barttelbort; S Ariyan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Normal and pathologic CT anatomy of the mandible.

Authors:  A G Osborn; W H Hanafee; A A Mancuso
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Spread of squamous cell carcinoma to the nonirradiated edentulous mandible--a preliminary report.

Authors:  I A McGregor; D G MacDonald
Journal:  Head Neck Surg       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Current concepts in management of oral cancer--surgery.

Authors:  Jatin P Shah; Ziv Gil
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.337

9.  Prognosis for gingival carcinomas with a delayed diagnosis after dental extraction.

Authors:  Kenji Yamagata; Hiroyuki Ito; Kojiro Onizawa; Masanobu Yamatoji; Toru Yanagawa; Hiroki Bukawa
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Tomographic studies of human jaws to assess potentials for preserving the blood supply in rim mandibulectomies.

Authors:  S Ariyan; J J Abrahams; S W Brattelbort; P Mutalik
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  3 in total

1.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Joo; Jae-Keun Cho; Bon Seok Koo; Minsu Kwon; Seong Keun Kwon; Soon Young Kwon; Min-Su Kim; Jeong Kyu Kim; Heejin Kim; Innchul Nam; Jong-Lyel Roh; Young Min Park; Il-Seok Park; Jung Je Park; Sung-Chan Shin; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Seongjun Won; Chang Hwan Ryu; Tae Mi Yoon; Giljoon Lee; Doh Young Lee; Myung-Chul Lee; Joon Kyoo Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Jae-Yol Lim; Jae Won Chang; Jeon Yeob Jang; Man Ki Chung; Yuh-Seok Jung; Jae-Gu Cho; Yoon Seok Choi; Jeong-Seok Choi; Guk Haeng Lee; Phil-Sang Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 2.  Performance of Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cancer Surgery: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Elisa M Barroso; Yassine Aaboubout; Lisette C van der Sar; Hetty Mast; Aniel Sewnaik; Jose A Hardillo; Ivo Ten Hove; Maria R Nunes Soares; Lars Ottevanger; Tom C Bakker Schut; Gerwin J Puppels; Senada Koljenović
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  The Impact of Histopathological Features on the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eder da Silva Dolens; Mauricio Rocha Dourado; Alhadi Almangush; Tuula A Salo; Clarissa Araujo Gurgel Rocha; Sabrina Daniela da Silva; Peter A Brennan; Ricardo D Coletta
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.