Literature DB >> 14756588

Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: an interpersonal approach.

Virginia S Y Kwan1, Oliver P John, David A Kenny, Michael H Bond, Richard W Robins.   

Abstract

Self-enhancement bias has been studied from 2 perspectives: L. Festinger's (1954) social comparison theory (self-enhancers perceive themselves more positively than they perceive others) and G. W. Allport's (1937) self-insight theory (self-enhancers perceive themselves more positively than they are perceived by others). These 2 perspectives are theoretically and empirically distinct, and the failure to recognize their differences has led to a protracted debate. A new interpersonal approach to self-enhancement decomposes self-perception into 3 components: perceiver effect, target effect, and unique self-perception. Both theoretical derivations and an illustrative study suggest that this resulting measure of self-enhancement is less confounded by unwanted components of interpersonal perception than previous social comparison and self-insight measures. Findings help reconcile conflicting views about whether self-enhancement is adaptive or maladaptive.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14756588     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  21 in total

1.  Unskilled but subjectively aware: Metacognitive monitoring ability and respective awareness in low-performing students.

Authors:  Marion Händel; Eva S Fritzsche
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

Review 2.  Conceptualizing changes in behavior in intervention research: the range of possible changes model.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes; Alan E Kazdin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: a componential approach.

Authors:  Virginia S Y Kwan; Oliver P John; Richard W Robins; Lu Lu Kuang
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-06

4.  Using Modern Methods for Missing Data Analysis with the Social Relations Model: A Bridge to Social Network Analysis.

Authors:  Terrence D Jorgensen; K Jean Forney; Jeffrey A Hall; Steven Giles
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2017-12-14

5.  People Believe That They Are Prototypically Good or Bad.

Authors:  Michael M Roy; Michael J Liersch; Stephen Broomell
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2013-11-01

6.  Foundations of Arrogance: A Broad Survey and Framework for Research.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Eryn J Adams; Sabrina Bhangal; Mike Corcoran; Reed Decker; Ciera E Dockter; Abby T Eubank; Courtney L Gann; Nathaniel R Greene; Ashley C Helle; Namyeon Lee; Anh T Nguyen; Kyle R Ripley; John E Scofield; Melissa A Tapia; Katie L Threlkeld; Ashley L Watts
Journal:  Rev Gen Psychol       Date:  2019-09-19

7.  Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.

Authors:  Amy J C Cuddy; Susan T Fiske; Virginia S Y Kwan; Peter Glick; Stéphanie Demoulin; Jacques-Philippe Leyens; Michael Harris Bond; Jean-Claude Croizet; Naomi Ellemers; Ed Sleebos; Tin Tin Htun; Hyun-Jeong Kim; Greg Maio; Judi Perry; Kristina Petkova; Valery Todorov; Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón; Elena Morales; Miguel Moya; Marisol Palacios; Vanessa Smith; Rolando Perez; Jorge Vala; Rene Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-03

8.  Neural correlates of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Authors:  Alana Muller; Lindsey A Sirianni; Richard J Addante
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Regions of the MPFC differentially tuned to social and nonsocial affective evaluation.

Authors:  Lasana T Harris; Samuel M McClure; Wouter van den Bos; Jonathan D Cohen; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Assessing the neural correlates of self-enhancement bias: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Virginia S Y Kwan; Veronica Barrios; Giorgio Ganis; Jamie Gorman; Claudia Lange; Monisha Kumar; Alejandro Shepard; Julian Paul Keenan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.