Literature DB >> 18505318

Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: a componential approach.

Virginia S Y Kwan1, Oliver P John, Richard W Robins, Lu Lu Kuang.   

Abstract

Four studies implemented a componential approach to assessing self-enhancement and contrasted this approach with 2 earlier ones: social comparison (comparing self-ratings with ratings of others) and self-insight (comparing self-ratings with ratings by others). In Study 1, the authors varied the traits being rated to identify conditions that lead to more or less similarity between approaches. In Study 2, the authors examined the effects of acquaintance on the conditions identified in Study 1. In Study 3, the authors showed that using rankings renders the self-insight approach equivalent to the component-based approach but also has limitations in assessing self-enhancement. In Study 4, the authors compared the social-comparison and the component-based approaches in terms of their psychological implications; the relation between self-enhancement and adjustment depended on the self-enhancement approach used, and the positive-adjustment correlates of the social-comparison approach disappeared when the confounding influence of the target effect was controlled. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18505318      PMCID: PMC4082243          DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  39 in total

1.  Positive illusions about the self: short-term benefits and long-term costs.

Authors:  R W Robins; J S Beer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Personality judgments in adolescents' families: the perceiver, the target, their relationship, and the family.

Authors:  Susan J T Branje; Marcel A G van Aken; Cornelis F M van Lieshout; Jolanda J J P Mathijssen
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2003-02

3.  Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: an interpersonal approach.

Authors:  Virginia S Y Kwan; Oliver P John; David A Kenny; Michael H Bond; Richard W Robins
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Portrait of the self-enhancer: well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless?

Authors:  Shelley E Taylor; Jennifer S Lerner; David K Sherman; Rebecca M Sage; Nina K McDowell
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-01

5.  Agreeing response set and social desirability.

Authors:  A COUCH; K KENISTON
Journal:  J Abnorm Soc Psychol       Date:  1961-01

6.  Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy?: self-esteem matters.

Authors:  Constantine Sedikides; Eric A Rudich; Aiden P Gregg; Madoka Kumashiro; Caryl Rusbult
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-09

7.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.

Authors:  W K Hofstee; B de Raad; L R Goldberg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-07

8.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.

Authors:  J Kruger; D Dunning
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-12

9.  Three types of narcissism in women from college to mid-life.

Authors:  P Wink
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  1992-03

10.  PERSON: a general model of interpersonal perception.

Authors:  David A Kenny
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2004
View more
  8 in total

1.  Autistic People Do Enhance Their Selves.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Jennifer L Stevenson; Sebastian Dern
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2019-09-02

2.  Neural and behavioral responses during self-evaluative processes differ in youth with and without autism.

Authors:  Jennifer H Pfeifer; Junaid S Merchant; Natalie L Colich; Leanna M Hernandez; Jeff D Rudie; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-02

3.  In search of our true selves: feedback as a path to self-knowledge.

Authors:  Kathryn L Bollich; Paul M Johannet; Simine Vazire
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-04

4.  Forecasting the student-professor matches that result in unusually effective teaching.

Authors:  Jennifer Gross; Brian Lakey; Jessica L Lucas; Ryan LaCross; Andrea R Plotkowski; Bo Winegard
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2014-06-23

5.  Leniency Bias in Performance Ratings: The Big-Five Correlates.

Authors:  Kevin H C Cheng; C Harry Hui; Wayne F Cascio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10

6.  Seeing the self through rose-colored glasses: A cross-cultural study of positive illusions using a behavioral approach.

Authors:  Hyunji Kim; Hwaryung Lee; Ronda F Lo; Eunkook M Suh; Ulrich Schimmack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  This examined life: the upside of self-knowledge for interpersonal relationships.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Tenney; Simine Vazire; Matthias R Mehl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Now You Do It, Now You Don't: The Mixed Blessing of Creative Deviance as a Prosocial Behavior.

Authors:  Jigyashu Shukla; Ronit Kark
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.