BACKGROUND: The United States has relied upon partner notification strategies to help break the chain of infection and re-infection for sexually transmitted diseases (STD). Physicians are a vital link in the system of STD control, but little is known of physician opinions about partner notification strategies. METHODS: We collected opinions about partner notification from a national probability sample of physicians in specialties diagnosing STDs. Physicians responded to 17 questions about three relevant forms of STD partner notification: patient based referral, provider based referral, and case reporting. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analyses showed that responses for each form of partner notification could be grouped into four categories: perceived practice norms, infection control, patient relationships, and time/money. Multivariate analyses of the factors showed that physicians endorsed patient based referral most favourably and provider based referral least favourably. CONCLUSION: Physicians' opinions about partner notification strategies appear to reflect objective reality in some areas, but not in others. Strategies that improve the fit between physicians' opinions and effective notification are needed: some are discussed here.
BACKGROUND: The United States has relied upon partner notification strategies to help break the chain of infection and re-infection for sexually transmitted diseases (STD). Physicians are a vital link in the system of STD control, but little is known of physician opinions about partner notification strategies. METHODS: We collected opinions about partner notification from a national probability sample of physicians in specialties diagnosing STDs. Physicians responded to 17 questions about three relevant forms of STD partner notification: patient based referral, provider based referral, and case reporting. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analyses showed that responses for each form of partner notification could be grouped into four categories: perceived practice norms, infection control, patient relationships, and time/money. Multivariate analyses of the factors showed that physicians endorsed patient based referral most favourably and provider based referral least favourably. CONCLUSION: Physicians' opinions about partner notification strategies appear to reflect objective reality in some areas, but not in others. Strategies that improve the fit between physicians' opinions and effective notification are needed: some are discussed here.
Authors: Janet S St Lawrence; Daniel E Montaño; Danuta Kasprzyk; William R Phillips; Keira Armstrong; Jami S Leichliter Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: P M Gorbach; S O Aral; C Celum; B P Stoner; W L Whittington; J Galea; N Coronado; S Connor; K K Holmes Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: M R Golden; W L Whittington; H H Handsfield; C Malinski; A Clark; J P Hughes; P M Gorbach; K K Holmes Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Catherine Mathews; Nicol Coetzee; Merrick Zwarenstein; Carl Lombard; Sally Guttmacher; Andrew Oxman; George Schmid Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Matthew R Golden; Sharon G Hopkins; Martina Morris; King K Holmes; H Hunter Handsfield Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: A Apoola; K W Radcliffe; S Das; V Robshaw; G Gilleran; B S Kumari; M Boothby; R Rajakumar Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Alexandra Choi; Audrey Campbell; Theodora Consolacion; Jasmine Pawa; Brian Ng; Jason Wong Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 3.025
Authors: Kevin A T M Theunissen; Pim Schipper; Christian J P A Hoebe; Rik Crutzen; Gerjo Kok; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 2.655