J R Skelton1, P M Matthews. 1. Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although it is accepted that history taking is central to correct diagnosis, little work has been undertaken on the development of sexual history taking, particularly in a primary care context where sexual health may not occur to the patient. Embarrassment is recognized as one major problem. This paper reports on a series of teaching interventions designed to help primary health care professionals (doctors and nurses) to identify and deal effectively with sexual health issues in the consultation. METHODS: 141 participants took part in nine different courses, with 114 returning evaluations. All courses involved tutorial teaching on clinical and ethicolegal issues and role play with trained professional role-players; some involved video-based dramatizations to particularize principles in context. During role play sessions, which were followed by detailed, contextualized feedback, clinical issues, attitudinal issues (e.g. articulating a sense of personal embarrassment, and the risk of stereotyping), and ethicolegal issues were all discussed, as were examples of words and phrases which participants were invited to try out. OUTCOMES: The overall quality of the courses was rated by participants, on average, at 89.95 (maximum 100), and the relevance of the topic at 91.40. Free text comments centred on the power of the training as a consciousness raiser, on the need to alter communication strategies, the need to change existing clinical practice and the value of role play as a methodology. Interactive courses on sexual health are highly acceptable to participants.
OBJECTIVES: Although it is accepted that history taking is central to correct diagnosis, little work has been undertaken on the development of sexual history taking, particularly in a primary care context where sexual health may not occur to the patient. Embarrassment is recognized as one major problem. This paper reports on a series of teaching interventions designed to help primary health care professionals (doctors and nurses) to identify and deal effectively with sexual health issues in the consultation. METHODS: 141 participants took part in nine different courses, with 114 returning evaluations. All courses involved tutorial teaching on clinical and ethicolegal issues and role play with trained professional role-players; some involved video-based dramatizations to particularize principles in context. During role play sessions, which were followed by detailed, contextualized feedback, clinical issues, attitudinal issues (e.g. articulating a sense of personal embarrassment, and the risk of stereotyping), and ethicolegal issues were all discussed, as were examples of words and phrases which participants were invited to try out. OUTCOMES: The overall quality of the courses was rated by participants, on average, at 89.95 (maximum 100), and the relevance of the topic at 91.40. Free text comments centred on the power of the training as a consciousness raiser, on the need to alter communication strategies, the need to change existing clinical practice and the value of role play as a methodology. Interactive courses on sexual health are highly acceptable to participants.
Authors: M Hogben; J S St Lawrence; D E Montaño; D Kasprzyk; J S Leichliter; W R Phillips Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; J Dennis Fortenberry; Kathryn I Pollak; Terrill Bravender; J Kelly Davis; Truls Ostbye; James A Tulsky; Rowena J Dolor; Cleveland G Shields Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Farnaza Ariffin; Ken Lee Chin; ChirkJenn Ng; Maizatullifah Miskan; Verna KarMun Lee; Mohammad Rodi Isa Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-06-17
Authors: Linda Drozdowicz; Elisabeth Gordon; Desiree Shapiro; Sansea Jacobson; Isheeta Zalpuri; Colin Stewart; A Lee Lewis; Lee Robinson; Myo Thwin Myint; Peter Daniolos; Edwin D Williamson; Richard Pleak; Ana Soledade Graeff Martins; Mary Margaret Gleason; Cathryn A Galanter; Sarah Miller; Dorothy Stubbe; Andrés Martin Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 4.157