Literature DB >> 14754726

Biomechanical properties of patellar and hamstring graft tibial fixation techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: experimental study with roentgen stereometric analysis.

Frank Adam1, Dietrich Pape, Karin Schiel, Oliver Steimer, Dieter Kohn, Stefan Rupp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliable fixation of the soft hamstring grafts in ACL reconstruction has been reported as problematic. HYPOTHESIS: The biomechanical properties of patellar tendon (PT) grafts fixed with biodegradable screws (PTBS) are superior compared to quadrupled hamstring grafts fixed with BioScrew (HBS) or Suture-Disc fixation (HSD). STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study with roentgen stereometric analysis (RSA).
METHODS: Ten porcine specimens were prepared for each group. In the PT group, the bone plugs were fixed with a 7 x 25 mm BioScrew. In the hamstring group, four-stranded tendon grafts were anchored within a tibial tunnel of 8 mm diameter either with a 7 x 25 mm BioScrew or eight polyester sutures knotted over a Suture-Disc. The grafts were loaded stepwise, and micromotion of the graft inside the tibial tunnel was measured with RSA.
RESULTS: Hamstring grafts failed at lower loads (HBS: 536 N, HSD 445 N) than the PTBS grafts (658 N). Stiffness in the PTBS group was much greater compared to the hamstring groups (3500 N/mm versus HBS = 517 N/mm and HSD = 111 N/mm). Irreversible graft motion after graft loading with 200 N was measured at 0.03 mm (PTBS), 0.38mm (HBS), and 1.85mm (HSD). Elasticity for the HSD fixation was measured at 0.67 mm at 100 N and 1.32 mm at 200 N load.
CONCLUSION: Hamstring graft fixation with BioScrew and Suture-Disc displayed less stiffness and early graft motion compared to PTBS fixation. Screw fixation of tendon grafts is superior to Suture-Disc fixation with linkage material since it offers greater stiffness and less graft motion inside the tibial tunnel. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results revealed graft motion for hamstring fixation with screw or linkage material at loads that occur during rehabilitation. This, in turn, may lead to graft laxity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14754726     DOI: 10.1177/0095399703258608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  Influence of the initial rupture size and tendon subregion on three-dimensional biomechanical properties of single-row and double-row rotator cuff reconstructions.

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; F Raber; L C Busch; D Kohn; M Kieb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Interference screws should be shorter than the hamstring tendon graft in the bone tunnel for best fixation.

Authors:  Michael Stalder; Mazda Farshad; Jess G Snedeker; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Emerging ideas: soft tissue applications of radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Lucian B Solomon; Stuart A Callary
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bioabsorbable screw divergence angle, not tunnel preparation method influences soft tissue tendon graft-bone tunnel fixation in healthy bone.

Authors:  Andrew R Duffee; Jeffrey A Brunelli; John Nyland; Robert Burden; Akbar Nawab; David Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Close-looped graft suturing improves mechanical properties of interference screw fixation in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  María Prado; Belén Martín-Castilla; Alejandro Espejo-Reina; José Miguel Serrano-Fernández; Ana Pérez-Blanca; Francisco Ezquerro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Fixation strength of biocomposite wedge interference screw in ACL reconstruction: effect of screw length and tunnel/screw ratio. A controlled laboratory study.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Fernando Martínez; Daniel Iglesias; José Cegoñino; Elena Ibarz; Luis Gracia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  [Ligament bracing--augmented cruciate ligament sutures: biomechanical studies of a new treatment concept].

Authors:  M Heitmann; A Dratzidis; M Jagodzinski; P Wohlmuth; C Hurschler; K Püschel; A Giannakos; A Preiss; K-H Frosch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  Anatomical Individualized ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Soheil Sabzevari; Sebastián Irarrázaval; Tom Chao; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-10

9.  Biomechanical consequences of proximal biceps tenodesis stitch location: musculotendinous junction versus tendon only.

Authors:  Ulrich J Spiegl; Sean D Smith; Simon A Euler; Peter J Millett; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  ACL graft migration under cyclic loading.

Authors:  Christian Staerke; Andreas Möhwald; Karl-Heinz Gröbel; Carsten Bochwitz; Roland Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.