Literature DB >> 22290126

Influence of the initial rupture size and tendon subregion on three-dimensional biomechanical properties of single-row and double-row rotator cuff reconstructions.

O Lorbach1, D Pape, F Raber, L C Busch, D Kohn, M Kieb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Influence of the initial rotator cuff tear size and of different subregions of the SSP tendon on the cyclic loading behavior of a modified single-row reconstruction compared to a suture-bridging double-row repair.
METHODS: Artificial tears (25 and 35 mm) were created in the rotator cuff of 24 human cadaver shoulders. The reconstructions were performed as a single-row repair (SR) using a modified suture configuration or a suture-bridge double-row repair (DR). Radiostereometric analysis was used under cyclic loading (50 cycles, 10–180 N, 10–250 N) to calculate cyclic displacement in three different planes (anteroposterior (x), craniocaudal (y) and mediolateral (z) level). Cyclic displacement was recorded, and differences in cyclic displacement of the anterior compared to the posterior subregions of the tendon were calculated.
RESULTS: In small-to-medium tears (25 mm) and medium-to-large tears (35 mm), significant lower cyclic displacement was seen for the SR-reconstruction compared to the DR-repair at 180 N (p ≤ 0.0001; p = 0.001) and 250 N (p = 0.001; p = 0.007) in the x-level. These results were confirmed in the y-level at 180 N (p = 0.001; p = 0.0022) and 250 N (p = 0.005; p = 0.0018). Comparison of the initial tear sizes demonstrated significant differences in cyclic displacement for the DR technique in the x-level at 180 N (p = 0.002) and 250 N (p = 0.004). Comparison of the anterior versus the posterior subregion of the tendon revealed significant lower gap formation in the posterior compared to the anterior subregions in the x-level for both tested rotator cuff repairs (p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The tested single-row repair using a modified suture configuration achieved superior results in three-dimensional measurements of cyclic displacement compared to the tested double-row suture-bridge repair. The results were dependent on the initial rupture size of the rotator cuff tear. Furthermore, significant differences were found between tendon subregions of the rotator cuff with significantly higher gap formation for the anterior compared to the posterior subregions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22290126     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1892-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  45 in total

1.  Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alberto G Schneeberger; Andreas von Roll; Fabian Kalberer; Hilaire A C Jacob; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications.

Authors:  J Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-08

3.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a triple-loaded suture anchor and a modified Mason-Allen technique (Alex stitch).

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo; Marco Conti; Mario Borroni; Stephen J Snyder
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Andrea Grasso; Giuseppe Milano; Matteo Salvatore; Gianluca Falcone; Laura Deriu; Carlo Fabbriciani
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  G Selvik
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.

Authors:  Craig A Cummins; Sabrina Strickland; Richard C Appleyard; Zoltan L Szomor; Jeanette Marshall; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations.

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Bettina Kieser; Alexander Schill; Christian Gerhardt; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair.

Authors:  Pankaj Sharma; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  D F Gazielly; P Gleyze; C Montagnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Robert T Burks; Julia Crim; Nick Brown; Barbara Fink; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advances in biology and mechanics of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Olaf Lorbach; Mike H Baums; Tanja Kostuj; Stephan Pauly; Markus Scheibel; Andrew Carr; Nasim Zargar; Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Rotator cuff tears: An evidence based approach.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Vishesh Khanna; Arif Gul; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of suture-tendon interface and tissue holding of three suture configurations in torn and degenerated versus intact human rotator cuffs.

Authors:  Matthias V Wlk; Ashraf Abdelkafy; Michael Hexel; Christian Krasny; Nicolas Aigner; Roland Meizer; Franz Landsiedl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Load to Failure and Stiffness: Anchor Placement and Suture Pattern Effects on Load to Failure in Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Amanda O Esquivel; Douglas D Duncan; Nikola Dobrasevic; Stephanie M Marsh; Stephen E Lemos
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.