Literature DB >> 14752664

Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: the role of explicit knowledge.

Elisabet Tubau1, Joan López-Moliner.   

Abstract

In several sequence learning studies it has been suggested that response control shifts from the stimuli to some internal representation (i.e., motor program) through the learning process. The main questions addressed in this paper are whether this control shift is related to explicit knowledge and whether the formation of these internal representations depends on the stimulus attributes. In one experiment we compared the learning of a response sequence triggered by either spatial location or location symbol (left-right) by using a serial response task (SRT). Symbols were presented at either a centered or random location. The results showed that in the symbolic conditions the shift of response control correlated with the emergence of explicit knowledge. Only participants with complete explicit knowledge seemed to learn the sequence structure beyond probabilistic information (response time "RT" did not depend on the frequency of the response). Moreover, these participants were able to overcome, when needed, spatial interference (RT was the same for both spatially corresponding and non-corresponding trials). However, when spatial location was relevant, RT was always faster, especially for more frequent responses. These results suggest that the relevant stimulus dimension (location or symbol) seems to engage different sequence learning mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14752664     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0139-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  19 in total

1.  The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory.

Authors:  B M Lawrence; J Myerson; H M Oonk; R A Abrams
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2001 Jul-Nov

2.  Sequential analysis of a Simon task--evidence for an attention-shift account.

Authors:  W Notebaert; E Soetens; A Melis
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2001

3.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

4.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study.

Authors:  E Hazeltine; S T Grafton; R Ivry
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue.

Authors:  J R Simon; A M Small
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1969-10

8.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning.

Authors:  P A Frensch; C S Miner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

10.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; S B Kenny; M A Derr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  David J Marcus; Canan Karatekin; Steven Markiewicz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

2.  The role of awareness in anticipation and recall performance in the Hebb repetition paradigm: implications for sequence learning.

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Pierre Boucher; Sébastien Tremblay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

3.  Frames of reference during implicit and explicit learning.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Ovidiu V Lungu; Tobias Waechter; Daniel T Willingham; James Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Response-mode shifts during sequence learning of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Dennis Rünger; F Gregory Ashby; Nathalie Picard; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-09

5.  Striatal and hippocampal involvement in motor sequence chunking depends on the learning strategy.

Authors:  Ovidiu Lungu; Oury Monchi; Geneviève Albouy; Thomas Jubault; Emanuelle Ballarin; Yves Burnod; Julien Doyon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Isoluminant stimuli in a familiar discrete keying sequence task can be ignored.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-12-06

7.  Knowing what to respond in the future does not cancel the influence of past events.

Authors:  Elisabet Tubau; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking.

Authors:  Lasse Pelzer; Christoph Naefgen; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-22

9.  The interplay between unexpected events and behavior in the development of explicit knowledge in implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Clarissa Lustig; Sarah Esser; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-12-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.