Literature DB >> 14751332

The tobacco industry's political efforts to derail the EPA report on ETS.

Monique E Muggli1, Richard D Hurt, James Repace.   

Abstract

Previously secret tobacco industry documents detailed a multifaceted approach of political strategies aimed to derail the 1993 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) risk assessment on environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). These pervasive strategies included the following: (1) lobbying the first Bush Administration to approve an executive order that would impose new risk assessment standards for federal agencies, thus delaying the release of the EPA report; (2) having the first Bush Administration transfer jurisdiction over ETS from the EPA to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), thus obviating the need for the release of the EPA report; and (3) applying enormous political pressure directly by alleging improper procedure and policy at EPA. Although some of the attempted strategies failed, the political pressure from Congressman Thomas Bliley (R-VA) was a success. This is the first report showing how a single member of Congress in conjunction with his staff, tobacco industry attorneys, and executives worked very aggressively to do the tobacco industry's bidding. These tactics successfully delayed the EPA risk assessment and placed a cloud over its validity that was not fully vindicated until December 2002 when the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the tobacco industry's suit against the EPA. The documents show that the industry will expend whatever effort is necessary to protect itself from public health policy that would adversely affect consumption of cigarettes and, therefore, profit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751332     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  16 in total

1.  Health conventions in smoke free places have positive economic impact.

Authors:  Diane Kunyk; Becky Freeman; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-04

2.  German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke.

Authors:  A Bornhäuser; J McCarthy; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  "Everyone knew but no one had proof": tobacco industry use of medical history expertise in US courts, 1990-2002.

Authors:  Robert N Proctor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Corporation-induced diseases, upstream epidemiologic surveillance, and urban health.

Authors:  René I Jahiel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Do we believe the tobacco industry lied to us? Association with smoking behavior in a military population.

Authors:  Robert C Klesges; Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman; Margaret Debon; G Wayne Talcott; Robert J Vanecek
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-06-15

6.  The 2014 Surgeon General's report: commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the 1964 Report of the Advisory Committee to the US Surgeon General and updating the evidence on the health consequences of cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Donald R Shopland; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  When tobacco targets direct democracy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Laposata; Allison P Kennedy; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies.

Authors:  Heikki Hiilamo; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Laposata; Richard Barnes; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Iowa Law Rev       Date:  2012-11

10.  Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research.

Authors:  Anne Landman; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.