Literature DB >> 14750709

Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Michigan.

Aaron M Peck1, Keri C Hornbuckle.   

Abstract

Synthetic musk fragrances are added to a wide variety of personal care and household products and are present in treated wastewater effluent. Here we report for the first time ambient air and water measurements of six polycyclic musks (AHTN, HHCB, ATII, ADBI, AHMI, and DPMI) and two nitro musks (musk xylene and musk ketone) in North America. The compounds were measured in the air and water of Lake Michigan and in the air of urban Milwaukee, WI. All of the compounds except DPMI were detected. HHCB and AHTN were found in the highest concentrations in all samples. Airborne concentrations of HHCB and AHTN average 4.6 and 2.9 ng/m3, respectively, in Milwaukee and 1.1 and 0.49 ng/m3 over the lake. The average water concentration of HHCB and AHTN in Lake Michigan was 4.7 and 1.0 ng/L, respectively. A lake-wide annual mass budget shows that wastewater treatment plant discharge is the major source (3470 kg/yr) of the synthetic musks while atmospheric deposition contributes less than 1%. Volatilization and outflow through the Straits of Mackinac are major loss mechanisms (2085 and 516 kg/yr for volatilization and outflow, respectively). Concentrations of HHCB are about one-half the predicted steady-state water concentrations in Lake Michigan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14750709     DOI: 10.1021/es034769y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  13 in total

Review 1.  Aquatic processes and systems in perspective.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2006-07-20

2.  Targeting aquatic microcontaminants for monitoring: exposure categorization and application to the Swiss situation.

Authors:  Christian W Götz; Christian Stamm; Kathrin Fenner; Heinz Singer; Michael Schärer; Juliane Hollender
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Distribution and fate of synthetic musks in the Songhua River, Northeastern China: influence of environmental variables.

Authors:  Binyu Lu; Yujie Feng; Peng Gao; Zhaohan Zhang; Nan Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Tissue concentrations, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification of synthetic musks in freshwater fish from Taihu Lake, China.

Authors:  Xiaolan Zhang; Qing Xu; Shoukuan Man; Xiangying Zeng; Yingxin Yu; Yuping Pang; Guoying Sheng; Jiamo Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Determination and environmental risk assessment of synthetic musks in the water and sediments of the Jiaozhou Bay wetland, China.

Authors:  Shujun Jiang; Ling Wang; Minggang Zheng; Yinghua Lou; Lei Shi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Designing field-based investigations of organic micropollutant fate in rivers.

Authors:  Clarissa Glaser; Marc Schwientek; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Erie and Lake Ontario sediment cores.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Emily K Linebaugh; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening.

Authors:  William D Wombacher; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Eng (New York)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.860

9.  The response of hydrophobic organics and potential toxicity in streams to urbanization of watersheds in six metropolitan areas of the United States.

Authors:  Wade L Bryant; Steven L Goodbred
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Toxicity of synthetic musks to early life stages of the freshwater mussel Lampsilis cardium.

Authors:  M P Gooding; T J Newton; M R Bartsch; K C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.