Literature DB >> 19475441

Targeting aquatic microcontaminants for monitoring: exposure categorization and application to the Swiss situation.

Christian W Götz1, Christian Stamm, Kathrin Fenner, Heinz Singer, Michael Schärer, Juliane Hollender.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Aquatic microcontaminants (MCs) comprise diverse chemical classes, such as pesticides, biocides, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and industrial chemicals. For water pollution control and the evaluation of water protection measures, it is crucial to screen for MCs. However, the selection and prioritization of which MCs to screen for is rather difficult and complex. Existing methods usually are strongly limited because of a lack of screening regulations or unavailability of required data. METHOD AND MODELS: Here, we present a simple exposure-based methodology that provides a systematic overview of a broad range of MCs according to their potential to occur in the water phase of surface waters. The method requires input of publicly available data only. Missing data are estimated with quantitative structure-property relationships. The presented substance categorization methodology is based on the chemicals' distribution behavior between different environmental media, degradation data, and input dynamics.
RESULTS: Seven different exposure categories are distinguished based on different compound properties and input dynamics. Ranking the defined exposure categories based on a chemical's potential to occur in the water phase of surface waters, exposure categories I and II contain chemicals with a very high potential, categories III and IV contain chemicals with a high potential, and categories V and VI contain chemicals with a moderate to low potential. Chemicals in category VII are not evaluated because of a lack of data. We illustrate and evaluate the methodology on the example of MCs in Swiss surface waters. Furthermore, a categorized list containing potentially water-relevant chemicals is provided. DISCUSSION: Chemicals of categories I and III continuously enter surface waters and are thus likely to show relatively steady concentrations. Therefore, they are best suited for water monitoring programs requiring a relatively low sampling effort. Chemicals in categories II and IV have complex input dynamics. They are consequently more difficult to monitor. However, they should be considered if an overall picture is needed that includes contaminants from diffuse sources.
CONCLUSIONS: The presented methodology supports compound selection for (a) water quality guidance, (b) monitoring programs, and (c) further research on the chemical's ecotoxicology. The results from the developed categorization procedure are supported by data on consumption and observed concentrations in Swiss surface waters. The presented methodology is a tool to preselect potential hazardous substances based on exposure-based criteria for policy guidance and monitoring programs and a first important step for a detailed risk assessment for potential microcontaminants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19475441     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0167-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  29 in total

1.  Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Michigan.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Simultaneous assessment of sources, processes, and factors influencing herbicide losses to surface waters in a small agricultural catchment.

Authors:  Christian Leu; Heinz Singer; Christian Stamm; Stephan R Müller; René P Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Quantification of the new triketone herbicides, sulcotrione and mesotrione, and other important herbicides and metabolites, at the ng/l level in surface waters using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Luciana Gomides Freitas; Christian W Götz; Matthias Ruff; Heinz P Singer; Stephan R Müller
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: proposing a classification scheme.

Authors:  Adriano Joss; Sebastian Zabczynski; Anke Göbel; Burkhard Hoffmann; Dirk Löffler; Christa S McArdell; Thomas A Ternes; Angela Thomsen; Hansruedi Siegrist
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Polar pollutants entry into the water cycle by municipal wastewater: a European perspective.

Authors:  Thorsten Reemtsma; Stefan Weiss; Jutta Mueller; Mira Petrovic; Susana González; Damia Barcelo; Francesc Ventura; Thomas P Knepper
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Including mixtures in the determination of water quality criteria for herbicides in surface water.

Authors:  Nathalie Chèvre; Christian Loepfe; Heinz Singer; Christian Stamm; Kathrin Fenner; Beate I Escher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Occurrence and mass flows of fluorochemicals in the Glatt Valley watershed, Switzerland.

Authors:  Carin A Huset; Aurea C Chiaia; Douglas F Barofsky; Niels Jonkers; Hans-Peter E Kohler; Christoph Ort; D Walter Giger; Jennifer A Field
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Polycyclic musk fragrances in different environmental compartments in Berlin (Germany).

Authors:  H Fromme; T Otto; K Pilz
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Benzotriazole and tolyltriazole as aquatic contaminants. 1. Input and occurrence in rivers and lakes.

Authors:  Walter Giger; Christian Schaffner; Hans-Peter E Kohler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Occurrence and sorption behavior of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in activated sludge treatment.

Authors:  Anke Göbel; Angela Thomsen; Christa S McArdell; Adriano Joss; Walter Giger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  7 in total

1.  Probabilistic risk assessment of insecticide concentrations in agricultural surface waters: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Sebastian Stehle; Anja Knäbel; Ralf Schulz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Prioritisation of organic contaminants in a river basin using chemical analyses and bioassays.

Authors:  Tvrtko Smital; Senka Terzić; Jovica Lončar; Ivan Senta; Roko Žaja; Marta Popović; Iva Mikac; Knut-Erik Tollefsen; Kevin V Thomas; Marijan Ahel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Active and passive sampling for the assessment of hydrophilic organic contaminants in a river basin-ecotoxicological risk assessment.

Authors:  Evangelia Terzopoulou; Dimitra Voutsa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Combining in vitro reporter gene bioassays with chemical analysis to assess changes in the water quality along the Ammer River, Southwestern Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian E Müller; Beate I Escher; Marc Schwientek; Martina Werneburg; Christiane Zarfl; Christian Zwiener
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.893

5.  Prospective mixture risk assessment and management prioritizations for river catchments with diverse land uses.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Colin D Brown; Dick de Zwart; Jerome Diamond; Scott D Dyer; Christopher M Holmes; Stuart Marshall; G Allen Burton
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Effects of treated wastewater on the ecotoxicity of small streams - Unravelling the contribution of chemicals causing effects.

Authors:  Cornelia Kienle; Etiënne L M Vermeirssen; Andrea Schifferli; Heinz Singer; Christian Stamm; Inge Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Smarter Sediment Screening: Effect-Based Quality Assessment, Chemical Profiling, and Risk Identification.

Authors:  Milo L de Baat; Nienke Wieringa; Steven T J Droge; Bart G van Hall; Froukje van der Meer; Michiel H S Kraak
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 9.028

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.