BACKGROUND: During recent years, cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mitomycin has been used for various malignancies. OBJECTIVE: To characterise the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mitomycin during HIPEC. METHODS: Forty-seven patients received mitomycin 35 mg/m2 intraperitoneally as a perfusion over 90 minutes. Mitomycin concentrations were determined in both the peritoneal perfusate and plasma. The observed concentration-time profiles were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was related to the haematological toxicity. RESULTS: Concentration-time profiles of mitomycin in perfusate and plasma were adequately described with one- and two-compartment models, respectively. The average volume of distribution of the perfusate compartment (V1) and rate constant from the perfusate to the systemic circulation (k12) were 4.5 +/- 1.1L and 0.014 +/- 0.003 min(-1), respectively (mean +/- SD, n = 47). The average volume of distribution of the central plasma compartment (V2), clearance from the central compartment (CL) and volume of distribution of the peripheral plasma compartment (V3) were 28 +/- 16L, 0.55 +/- 0.18 L/min and 36 +/- 8L, respectively. The relationship between the AUC in plasma and degree of leucopenia was described with a sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of mitomycin during HIPEC could be fitted successfully to a multicompartment model. Relationships between plasma exposure and haematological toxicity were quantified. The developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model can be used to simulate different dosage schemes in order to optimise mitomycin administration during HIPEC.
BACKGROUND: During recent years, cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mitomycin has been used for various malignancies. OBJECTIVE: To characterise the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mitomycin during HIPEC. METHODS: Forty-seven patients received mitomycin 35 mg/m2 intraperitoneally as a perfusion over 90 minutes. Mitomycin concentrations were determined in both the peritoneal perfusate and plasma. The observed concentration-time profiles were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was related to the haematological toxicity. RESULTS: Concentration-time profiles of mitomycin in perfusate and plasma were adequately described with one- and two-compartment models, respectively. The average volume of distribution of the perfusate compartment (V1) and rate constant from the perfusate to the systemic circulation (k12) were 4.5 +/- 1.1L and 0.014 +/- 0.003 min(-1), respectively (mean +/- SD, n = 47). The average volume of distribution of the central plasma compartment (V2), clearance from the central compartment (CL) and volume of distribution of the peripheral plasma compartment (V3) were 28 +/- 16L, 0.55 +/- 0.18 L/min and 36 +/- 8L, respectively. The relationship between the AUC in plasma and degree of leucopenia was described with a sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of mitomycin during HIPEC could be fitted successfully to a multicompartment model. Relationships between plasma exposure and haematological toxicity were quantified. The developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model can be used to simulate different dosage schemes in order to optimise mitomycin administration during HIPEC.
Authors: A J Witkamp; E de Bree; M M Kaag; H Boot; J H Beijnen; G W van Slooten; F van Coevorden; F A Zoetmulder Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: G Panteix; M Guillaumont; L Cherpin; J Cuichard; F N Gilly; P Y Carry; A Sayag; B Salle; A Brachet; J Bienvenu Journal: Oncology Date: 1993 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Konstantinos Votanopoulos; Chukwuemeka Ihemelandu; Perry Shen; John Stewart; Gregory Russell; Edward A Levine Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Olaf Sørensen; Anders Andersen; Harald Olsen; Kristian Alexandr; Per Olaf Ekstrøm; Karl-Erik Giercksky; Kjersti Flatmark Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Edward A Levine; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Perry Shen; Greg Russell; Joyce Fenstermaker; Paul Mansfield; David Bartlett; John H Stewart Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: I Ubink; A C F Bolhaqueiro; S G Elias; D A E Raats; A Constantinides; N A Peters; E C E Wassenaar; I H J T de Hingh; K P Rovers; W M U van Grevenstein; M M Laclé; G J P L Kops; I H M Borel Rinkes; O Kranenburg Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Angela Casado-Adam; Lidia Rodriguez-Ortiz; Sebastian Rufian-Peña; Cristobal Muñoz-Casares; Teresa Caro-Cuenca; Rosa Ortega-Salas; Maria Auxiliadora Fernandez-Peralbo; Maria Dolores Luque-de-Castro; Juan M Sanchez-Hidalgo; Cesar Hervas-Martinez; Antonio Romero-Ruiz; Javier Briceño; Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 4.964