A J Witkamp1, E de Bree, R Van Goethem, F A Zoetmulder. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, CX 1066 Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years surgical cytoreduction followed by intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was introduced as treatment modality in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. In the current review the rational for this approach, the prerequisites and the different techniques used are discussed. METHODS: A literature search through PubMed was performed. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic studies have shown an important dose advantage for intraperitoneal versus intravenous application. Hyperthermia enhances the penetration of cytostatic drugs into tumour tissue and also shows synergism with various cytostatic drugs. The penetration depth of drugs into tissue is limited, therefore HIPEC can only be effective in patients with minimal residual disease after (aggressive) surgery. HIPEC can be conducted in various ways, without clear proven advantage of one method over the others. Local complications after this combined treatment approach are mainly surgery related. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may cause systemic toxicity, dependent on the drug used. In randomised studies cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC has proven its value in the prevention of peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. Phase II data on HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin and pseudomyxoma peritonei are promising, but randomised studies are still not available. CONCLUSION: Aggressive surgical cytoreduction and HIPEC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy has a clear rational and seems to have clinical value. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: In recent years surgical cytoreduction followed by intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was introduced as treatment modality in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. In the current review the rational for this approach, the prerequisites and the different techniques used are discussed. METHODS: A literature search through PubMed was performed. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic studies have shown an important dose advantage for intraperitoneal versus intravenous application. Hyperthermia enhances the penetration of cytostatic drugs into tumour tissue and also shows synergism with various cytostatic drugs. The penetration depth of drugs into tissue is limited, therefore HIPEC can only be effective in patients with minimal residual disease after (aggressive) surgery. HIPEC can be conducted in various ways, without clear proven advantage of one method over the others. Local complications after this combined treatment approach are mainly surgery related. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may cause systemic toxicity, dependent on the drug used. In randomised studies cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC has proven its value in the prevention of peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. Phase II data on HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin and pseudomyxoma peritonei are promising, but randomised studies are still not available. CONCLUSION: Aggressive surgical cytoreduction and HIPEC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy has a clear rational and seems to have clinical value. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Pedro Bretcha-Boix; Jose Farré-Alegre; Manuel Sureda; Carlos Dussan; Juan José Pérez Ruixo; Antonio Brugarolas Masllorens Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Terence C Chua; Greg Robertson; Winston Liauw; Rhonda Farrell; Tristan D Yan; David L Morris Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-23 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Allyson M Womack; Andrea Hayes-Jordan; Rajarshi Pratihar; Denise A Barringer; James H Hall; Paul W Gidley; Jan S Lewin Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Deepa Magge; Mazen S Zenati; Frances Austin; Arun Mavanur; Magesh Sathaiah; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Heather Jones; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew Holtzman; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Olaf Sørensen; Anders Andersen; Harald Olsen; Kristian Alexandr; Per Olaf Ekstrøm; Karl-Erik Giercksky; Kjersti Flatmark Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 4.430