PURPOSE: To assess the performance of motion gating strategies for mouse cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) at high magnetic fields by quantifying the levels of motion artifact observed in images and spectra in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging (MRI) of the heart, diaphragm, and liver; MR angiography of the aortic arch; and slice-selective 1H-spectroscopy of the heart were performed on anesthetized C57Bl/6 mice at 11.75 T. Gating signals were derived using a custom-built physiological motion gating device, and the gating strategies considered were no gating, cardiac gating, conventional gating (i.e., blanking during respiration), automatic gating, and user-defined gating. Both automatic and user-defined modes used cardiac and respiratory gating with steady-state maintenance during respiration. Gating performance was assessed by quantifying the levels of motion artifact observed in images and the degree of amplitude and phase stability in spectra. RESULTS: User-defined gating with steady-state maintenance during respiration gave the best performance for mouse cardiac imaging, angiography, and spectroscopy, with a threefold increase in signal intensity and a sixfold reduction in noise intensity compared to cardiac gating only. CONCLUSION: Physiological gating with steady-state maintenance during respiration is essential for mouse cardiac MR at high magnetic fields. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of motion gating strategies for mouse cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) at high magnetic fields by quantifying the levels of motion artifact observed in images and spectra in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging (MRI) of the heart, diaphragm, and liver; MR angiography of the aortic arch; and slice-selective 1H-spectroscopy of the heart were performed on anesthetized C57Bl/6 mice at 11.75 T. Gating signals were derived using a custom-built physiological motion gating device, and the gating strategies considered were no gating, cardiac gating, conventional gating (i.e., blanking during respiration), automatic gating, and user-defined gating. Both automatic and user-defined modes used cardiac and respiratory gating with steady-state maintenance during respiration. Gating performance was assessed by quantifying the levels of motion artifact observed in images and the degree of amplitude and phase stability in spectra. RESULTS: User-defined gating with steady-state maintenance during respiration gave the best performance for mouse cardiac imaging, angiography, and spectroscopy, with a threefold increase in signal intensity and a sixfold reduction in noise intensity compared to cardiac gating only. CONCLUSION: Physiological gating with steady-state maintenance during respiration is essential for mouse cardiac MR at high magnetic fields. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Robert A de Kemp; Frederick H Epstein; Ciprian Catana; Benjamin M W Tsui; Erik L Ritman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bastiaan Driehuys; John Nouls; Alexandra Badea; Elizabeth Bucholz; Ketan Ghaghada; Alexandra Petiet; Laurence W Hedlund Journal: ILAR J Date: 2008
Authors: Cristian T Badea; Laurence W Hedlund; Julie F Boslego Mackel; Lan Mao; Howard A Rockman; G Allan Johnson Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2007 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Asim M Akhtar; Jurgen E Schneider; Stephanie J Chapman; Andrew Jefferson; Janet E Digby; Kulveer Mankia; Ye Chen; Martina A McAteer; Kathryn J Wood; Robin P Choudhury Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 3.240