Literature DB >> 14745332

The use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography before neoadjuvant chemotherapy to identify patients likely to be treated safely with breast-conserving surgery.

Sadako Akashi-Tanaka1, Takashi Fukutomi, Natsuko Sato, Eriko Iwamoto, Toru Watanabe, Noriyuki Katsumata, Masashi Ando, Kunihisa Miyakawa, Tadashi Hasegawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To select suitable candidates for breast-conserving treatment (BCT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), based on the classification of tumors into localized or diffuse types using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A relatively high rate of loco-regional failure after BCT has been reported with breast cancer downstaged by NAC. Accurate assessment of the suitability of BCT and the response to NAC, before the initiation of NAC, will allow the optimal selection of an appropriate therapeutic course.
METHODS: We evaluated 110 consecutive patients with operable breast carcinomas measuring 3-cm or more in diameter by CE-CT after NAC treatment with doxorubicin and docetaxel at National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, from May 1998 to November 2001. Lesions were classified as either localized or diffuse types by mammography (MMG), ultrasonography (US), and CE-CT.
RESULTS: Tumors designated as localized type by MMG, US, and CE-CT were reduced to tumors less than 3.0 cm (P < 0.0001) in a concentric circle (P < 0.0001). Localized tumors by CE-CT were treated safely with BCT maintaining a negative margin status (P = 0.01). In contrast, diffuse type tumors shrunk into a mosaic pattern consisting of tumors larger than 3.1 cm. Tumors classified as localized by CE-CT responded better pathologically than diffuse tumors (P = 0.0365). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that morphologic type by CE-CT and histologic type were significant predictors of candidates for safe BCT.
CONCLUSIONS: The classification of tumors into either localized or diffuse types, using CE-CT before NAC administration, accurately predicts which tumors will be suitable candidates for BCT after NAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745332      PMCID: PMC1356217          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000109157.15687.d9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of breast cancer management: focus on neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  S D Heys
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

Authors:  L Esserman; N Hylton; L Yassa; J Barclay; S Frankel; E Sickles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Fortin; M Larochelle; J Laverdière; S Lavertu; D Tremblay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Akashi-Tanaka; T Fukutomi; T Watanabe; N Katsumata; T Nanasawa; K Matsuo; K Miyakawa; H Tsuda
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: incidence and prognostic significance of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  R Rouzier; J M Extra; M Carton; M C Falcou; A Vincent-Salomon; A Fourquet; P Pouillart; E Bourstyn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  H M Kuerer; L A Newman; T L Smith; F C Ames; K K Hunt; K Dhingra; R L Theriault; G Singh; S M Binkley; N Sneige; T A Buchholz; M I Ross; M D McNeese; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi; S E Singletary
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component and small invasive foci of breast cancer.

Authors:  S Akashi-Tanaka ; T Fukutomi; K Miyakawa; T Nanasawa; K Matsuo; T Hasegawa; H Tsuda
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.239

8.  Pathological assessment of the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its implications for surgical management.

Authors:  M H El-Didi; M M Moneer; H M Khaled; S Makarem
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast carcinomas.

Authors:  A Makris; T J Powles; M Dowsett; C K Osborne; P A Trott; I N Fernando; S E Ashley; M G Ormerod; J C Titley; R K Gregory; D C Allred
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Locally advanced breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic evaluation of residual disease.

Authors:  G Trecate; E Ceglia; F Stabile; J D Tesoro-Tess; G Mariani; M Zambetti; R Musumeci
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Function-preserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hideo Inaji; Chiyomi Egawa; Yoshifumi Komoike; Kazuyoshi Motomura; Kinji Nishiyama; Tatsuki R Kataoka; Hiroki Koyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A Case of Pure Mucinous Breast Carcinoma in a 25-Year-Old Female Who Showed Complete Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy despite Poor Clinical Response.

Authors:  Pei Du; Chunjie Hou; Jinglan Tang; Ying Liu; Qiaohong Hu; Hongfeng He; Kefeng Lu; Lucou Chen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Clinicopathological features of tumors as predictors of the efficacy of primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Tadahiko Shien; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Kunihisa Miyakawa; Takashi Hojo; Chikako Shimizu; Kunihiko Seki; Masashi Ando; Tsutomu Kohno; Naruto Taira; Hiroyoshi Doihara; Noriyuki Katsumata; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Takayuki Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Evaluation of axillary status in patients with breast cancer using thin-section CT.

Authors:  Tadahiko Shien; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Miwa Yoshida; Takashi Hojo; Eriko Iwamoto; Kunihisa Miyakawa; Takayuki Kinoshita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Yu Ren; Jianjun He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predicting initial margin status in breast cancer patients during breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Zihao Pan; Liling Zhu; Qian Li; Jianguo Lai; Jingwen Peng; Fengxi Su; Shunrong Li; Kai Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type I (HTLV-I) Oncogenesis: Molecular Aspects of Virus and Host Interactions in Pathogenesis of Adult T cell Leukemia/Lymphoma (ATL).

Authors:  Sanaz Ahmadi Ghezeldasht; Abbas Shirdel; Mohammad Ali Assarehzadegan; Tahereh Hassannia; Hosian Rahimi; Rahele Miri; S A Rahim Rezaee
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.699

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.