Literature DB >> 9815725

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast carcinomas.

A Makris1, T J Powles, M Dowsett, C K Osborne, P A Trott, I N Fernando, S E Ashley, M G Ormerod, J C Titley, R K Gregory, D C Allred.   

Abstract

Our aim was to determine whether biological molecular markers can predict response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in patients with early breast cancer. Ninety patients (median age 56 years; range, 28-69 years) with primary operable breast carcinoma were studied. They were treated with four 3-weekly cycles of chemotherapy with mitozantrone, methotrexate (+/- mitomycin C), and tamoxifen prior to surgery. Fine-needle aspiration was used to obtain samples from patients prior to therapy, and the following parameters were assessed: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), p53, Ki67, Bcl-2, and c-erbB-2 measured by immunocytochemistry, and ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry. The tumors of 78% of the subjects responded (complete response, 9%; partial response, 69%) and 22% did not (no change, 20%; progressive disease, 2%). Response rates according to disease stage and patient age were as follows: T1, 74%; T2, 79%; T3/T4, 78%; age </=50 years, 76%; >50, 79% (P = not significant). Response rates for other parameters were as follows: ER-positive, 82%, and -negative, 70%; PgR-positive, 86%, and -negative, 71%; p53-positive, 74%, and -negative, 81%; Bcl-2-positive, 85%, and -negative 61%; c-erbB-2-positive, 57%, and -negative, 93%; Ki67 high, 77%, and low, 81%; SPF high, 77%, and low, 77%; aneuploid, 71%; and diploid, 85%. Only the difference for c-erbB-2 was statistically significant (P = 0.007). A trend for higher response rates to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for tumors that were positive for ER, PgR, and Bcl-2 was observed but did not reach statistical significance. Tumors negative for c-erbB-2 had a higher response rate, which was statistically significant. In contrast, Ki67, ploidy, SPF, and p53 failed to predict for response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9815725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  27 in total

1.  Clinical and pathological predictors of the response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Mónica Fernández-Sánchez; Armando Gamboa-Dominguez; Norma Uribe; Ana Cristina García-Ulloa; Diana Flores-Estrada; Myrna Candelaria; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Prognostic value of Bcl-2 in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Laura M Vargas-Roig; F Darío Cuello-Carrión; Nicolás Fernández-Escobar; Pedro Daguerre; Marcela Leuzzi; Jorge Ibarra; Francisco E Gago; Silvina B Nadin; Daniel R Ciocca
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-01-13       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Different methods of pretreatment Ki-67 labeling index evaluation in core biopsies of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to response to therapy.

Authors:  András Vörös; Erika Csörgő; Bence Kővári; Péter Lázár; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Orsolya Rusz; Tibor Nyári; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  Low cleaved caspase-7 levels indicate unfavourable outcome across all breast cancers.

Authors:  Andreas U Lindner; Federico Lucantoni; Damir Varešlija; Alexa Resler; Brona M Murphy; William M Gallagher; Arnold D K Hill; Leonie S Young; Jochen H M Prehn
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Veronique F Cocquyt; Vera R Schelfhout; Phillip N Blondeel; Herman T Depypere; Kristof K Daems; Rudolphe F Serreyn; Marleen M Praet; Simon J P Van Belle
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  The potential biomarkers in predicting pathologic response of breast cancer to three different chemotherapy regimens: a case control study.

Authors:  Linbo Wang; Zhinong Jiang; Meihua Sui; Jianguo Shen; Chaoyang Xu; Weimin Fan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Elevated thymidine kinase 1 in serum following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts poor outcome for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Heng Huang; Xing-Song Tian; Rong Li; Xian-Ming Wang; Wen Wen; Hong Guan; Ya-Jie Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13

10.  Impact of grade, hormone receptor, and HER-2 status in women with breast cancer on response to specific chemotherapeutic agents by in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay.

Authors:  Ja Seung Koo; Woohee Jung; Eunah Shin; Hy-de Lee; Joon Jeong; Kun-Hong Kim; Hyeongjae Jeong; Soon Won Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.