Literature DB >> 11241331

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

S Akashi-Tanaka1, T Fukutomi, T Watanabe, N Katsumata, T Nanasawa, K Matsuo, K Miyakawa, H Tsuda.   

Abstract

Determination of the extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is sometimes inaccurate by conventional diagnostic methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in depicting the extent of residual carcinomas. Fifty-seven patients with breast carcinomas of 3 cm diameter or more received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles of AT (doxorubicin and docetaxel). Before surgery, the patients underwent clinical examination, mammogram (MMG), ultrasonography (US), and CE-CT. Thirteen patients were not evaluated by CE-CT before surgery. Enhancement patterns on CE-CT were classified into multiple spots, tumor and spots, solid tumor type, and no enhancement. When all types of cancers were included in the analysis, clinical examination showed the best correlation with the pathology of the extent of residual carcinomas. However, except in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC), CE-CT showed the best correlation (R insertion mark2 = 0.537). More than half of the residual microcalcifications on MMG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggested residual viable tumor. In conclusion, CE-CT is the most accurate noninvasive technique for identifying the extent of the residual carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy if cases of IBC and ILC are excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241331     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0215(20010220)96:1<66::aid-ijc7>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Lavinia P Middleton; Aysegul A Sahin; Peter Dempsey; Aman U Buzdar; Attiqa N Mirza; Fredrick C Ames; Gildy V Babiera; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Claude Touzery; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Bruno Coudert; Laurent Arnould; Christophe Boichot; Alexandre Cochet; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Evaluation of axillary status in patients with breast cancer using thin-section CT.

Authors:  Tadahiko Shien; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Miwa Yoshida; Takashi Hojo; Eriko Iwamoto; Kunihisa Miyakawa; Takayuki Kinoshita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Microcalcification of Tumor is a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Aya Murata; Naoko Sannomiya; Naoki Miyamoto; Naoyuki Ueda; Akira Kamida; Yuki Koyanagi; Haruki Nagira; Eriko Matsuda; Yuki Hashimoto; Kengo Sato; Yumi Hirooka; Keiko Hosoya; Yuzo Takagi; Yuko Tanaka; Kunio Araki; Kiyosuke Ishiguro; Yasuaki Hirooka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.641

5.  The use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography before neoadjuvant chemotherapy to identify patients likely to be treated safely with breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Takashi Fukutomi; Natsuko Sato; Eriko Iwamoto; Toru Watanabe; Noriyuki Katsumata; Masashi Ando; Kunihisa Miyakawa; Tadashi Hasegawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Accuracy of clinical evaluation of locally advanced breast cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Raquel Prati; Christina A Minami; Jeff A Gornbein; Nanette Debruhl; Debbie Chung; Helena R Chang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  L Ollivier; C Balu-Maestro; J Leclère
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  [Evaluation of Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Pathologic Complete Response and Residual Tumor Size of Breast Cancer: Analysis on Accuracy of MRI and Affecting Factors].

Authors:  Hyun Soo Ahn; Yeong Yi An; Ye Won Jeon; Young Jin Suh; Hyun-Joo Choi
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-03-22

9.  Correlation between MRI morphological response patterns and histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial.

Authors:  Joana Reis; Owen Thomas; Maryam Lahooti; Marianne Lyngra; Hossein Schandiz; Joao Boavida; Kjell-Inge Gjesdal; Torill Sauer; Jürgen Geisler; Jonn Terje Geitung
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.