Literature DB >> 14745210

Longevity of batteries in internal pulse generators used for deep brain stimulation.

Mohammed Bin-Mahfoodh1, Clement Hamani, Elspeth Sime, Andres M Lozano.   

Abstract

The longevity of batteries in internal pulse generators (IPGs) used clinically for deep brain stimulation is not known. We conducted a study to assess the life span of these batteries. From 1993 to 2000, 163 single-channel batteries were surgically implanted in our institution. The electrical settings utilized in patients who had battery failures were assessed and the total electrical energy delivered (TEED) was calculated and correlated with battery longevity. Fourteen IPGs had battery failure requiring replacement. The median life span of the batteries was 45 months. Batteries with high energy consumption as assessed by TEED had a reduced life span (r = -0.82, p < or = 0.001). Patients with essential tremor who required battery replacement needed higher settings to control their symptoms and therefore presented a shorter battery life when compared to patients with Parkinson's disease. In our series of patients who needed battery replacement, battery longevity varied with stimulation parameters but was longer than expected from the manufacturer's specifications. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14745210     DOI: 10.1159/000075161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  16 in total

Review 1.  The history and future of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Jason M Schwalb; Clement Hamani
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Dynamics of the subthalamo-pallidal complex in Parkinson's disease during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  J Modolo; J Henry; A Beuter
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 1.365

3.  Evaluation of novel stimulus waveforms for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas J Foutz; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Optimized temporal pattern of brain stimulation designed by computational evolution.

Authors:  David T Brocker; Brandon D Swan; Rosa Q So; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a psychiatric perspective.

Authors:  Peter Giacobbe; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  High efficiency electrodes for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Warren M Grill; Xuefeng F Wei
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

Review 7.  Disease-specific longevity of impulse generators in deep brain stimulation and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christoph van Riesen; Georg Tsironis; Doreen Gruber; Fabian Klostermann; Patricia Krause; Gerd Helge Schneider; Andreas Kupsch
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Shorter pulse generator longevity and more frequent stimulator adjustments with pallidal DBS for dystonia versus other movement disorders.

Authors:  Pawan V Rawal; Leonardo Almeida; Luke B Smelser; He Huang; Barton L Guthrie; Harrison C Walker
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Management of deep brain stimulator battery failure: battery estimators, charge density, and importance of clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Kaihan Fakhar; Erin Hastings; Christopher R Butson; Kelly D Foote; Pam Zeilman; Michael S Okun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neurosurgical strategies for Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome.

Authors:  Karim Mukhida; Matthew Bishop; Murray Hong; Ivar Mendez
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.