Literature DB >> 19964297

High efficiency electrodes for deep brain stimulation.

Warren M Grill1, Xuefeng F Wei.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulators are powered with primary cell batteries and require surgical replacement when they are depleted. We sought to decrease power consumption, and thereby increase device lifetime by increasing neuronal stimulating efficiency with novel electrode designs. Our hypothesis was that high-perimeter electrodes that increase the variation of current density on their surface would generate larger activating functions for surrounding neurons, hence increasing stimulation efficiency. We implemented finite element models of cylindrical DBS electrodes with conventional circular perimeters, with serpentine perimeters, and with segmented contacts. The high-perimeter electrodes significantly increased the variation of current density on the electrode surface. We randomly positioned a population of 100 model axons around the electrodes and quantified neural activation with 100 micros cathodic stimuli. Input-output curves of percentage axons activated as a function of stimulation intensity indicated that the novel electrode geometries decreased power consumption by up to approximately 20% for axons parallel to the electrode and up to approximately 35% for axons perpendicular to the electrode. Reduced power consumption achieved with these designs will reduce the costs and risks associated with surgeries to replace depleted stimulators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19964297      PMCID: PMC3683652          DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  19 in total

1.  Complications associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement in response to device advisories.

Authors:  Paul A Gould; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Specific impedance of rabbit cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J B RANCK
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1963-02       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Xuefeng F Wei; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Excitation of central nervous system neurons by nonuniform electric fields.

Authors:  C C McIntyre; W M Grill
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements.

Authors:  L G Nowak; J Bullier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Neurophysiological effects of stimulation through electrodes in the human subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  P Ashby; Y J Kim; R Kumar; A E Lang; A M Lozano
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  [Pacemaker longevity. Replacement of the device].

Authors:  J C Deharo; P Djiane
Journal:  Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris)       Date:  2005-01

9.  Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  P Limousin; P Krack; P Pollak; A Benazzouz; C Ardouin; D Hoffmann; A L Benabid
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The pallidofugal motor fiber system in primates.

Authors:  Martin Parent; André Parent
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.891

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation for epilepsy: experimental approaches.

Authors:  John D Rolston; Sharanya Arcot Desai; Nealen G Laxpati; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  Analysis of deep brain stimulation electrode characteristics for neural recording.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Angelique C Paulk; Rina Zelmann; Britni Crocker; Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; Daniel S Weisholtz; R Mark Richardson; G Rees Cosgrove; Ziv M Williams; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Kip A Ludwig; Cristin G Welle; Pavel Takmakov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Optimizing a rodent model of Parkinson's disease for exploring the effects and mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Karl Nowak; Eilhard Mix; Jan Gimsa; Ulf Strauss; Kiran Kumar Sriperumbudur; Reiner Benecke; Ulrike Gimsa
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2011-04-05

6.  Electrochemical Evaluations of Fractal Microelectrodes for Energy Efficient Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Hyunsu Park; Pavel Takmakov; Hyowon Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Shielding effects of myelin sheath on axolemma depolarization under transverse electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Hui Ye; Jeffrey Ng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  A comparison of microelectrodes for a visual cortical prosthesis using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Emma Brunton; Arthur J Lowery; Ramesh Rajan
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2012-09-28

9.  High volumetric power density, non-enzymatic, glucose fuel cells.

Authors:  Vlad Oncescu; David Erickson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Model-Based Comparison of Deep Brain Stimulation Array Functionality with Varying Number of Radial Electrodes and Machine Learning Feature Sets.

Authors:  Benjamin A Teplitzky; Laura M Zitella; YiZi Xiao; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.380

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.