Literature DB >> 14736824

Classification of individual lung cancer cell lines based on DNA methylation markers: use of linear discriminant analysis and artificial neural networks.

Alberto M Marchevsky1, Jeffrey A Tsou, Ite A Laird-Offringa.   

Abstract

The classification of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can pose diagnostic problems due to inter-observer variability and other limitations of histopathology. There is an interest in developing classificatory models of lung neoplasms based on the analysis of multivariate molecular data with statistical methods and/or neural networks. DNA methylation levels at 20 loci were measured in 41 SCLC and 46 NSCLC cell lines with the quantitative real-time PCR method MethyLight. The data were analyzed with artificial neural networks (ANN) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to classify the cell lines into SCLC or into NSCLC. Models used either data from all 20 loci, or from five significant DNA methylation loci that were selected by a step-wise back-propagation procedure (PTGS2, CALCA, MTHFR, ESR1, and CDKN2A). The data were sorted randomly by cell line into 10 different data sets, each with training and testing subsets composed of 71 and 16 of the cases, respectively. Ten ANN models were trained using the 10 data sets: five using 20 variables, and five using the five variables selected by step-wise back-propagation. The ANN models with 20 input variables correctly classified 100% of the cell lines, while the models with only five variables correctly classified 87 to 100% of cases. For comparison, 10 different LDA models were trained and tested using the same data sets with either the original data or with logarithmically transformed data. Again, half of the models used all 20 variables while the others used only the five significant variables. LDA models provided correct classifications in 62.5% to 87.5% of cases. The classifications provided by all of the different models were compared with kappa statistics, yielding kappa values ranging from 0.25 to 1.0. We conclude that ANN models based on DNA methylation profiles can objectively classify SCLC and NSCLC cells lines with substantial to perfect concordance, while LDA models based on DNA methylation profiles provide poor to substantial concordance. Our work supports the promise of ANN analysis of DNA methylation data as a powerful approach for the development of automated methods for lung cancer classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736824      PMCID: PMC1867460          DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60488-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  42 in total

1.  Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns.

Authors:  J F Costello; M C Frühwald; D J Smiraglia; L J Rush; G P Robertson; X Gao; F A Wright; J D Feramisco; P Peltomäki; J C Lang; D E Schuller; L Yu; C D Bloomfield; M A Caligiuri; A Yates; R Nishikawa; H Su Huang; N J Petrelli; X Zhang; M S O'Dorisio; W A Held; W K Cavenee; C Plass
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation.

Authors:  C A Eads; K D Danenberg; K Kawakami; L B Saltz; C Blake; D Shibata; P V Danenberg; P W Laird
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Computerized interactive morphometry as an aid in the diagnosis of pleural effusions.

Authors:  A M Marchevsky; E Hauptman; J Gil; C Watson
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

4.  Computerized interactive morphometry as a potentially useful tool for the classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

Authors:  A Marchevsky; J Gil; D Silage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Applications of computerized interactive morphometry in pathology. II. A model for computer generated diagnosis.

Authors:  A M Marchevsky; J Gil
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Computerized interactive morphometry in pathology: current instrumentation and methods.

Authors:  A M Marchevsky; J Gil; H Jeanty
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Computerized classification of nuclear profiles in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

Authors:  A M Marchevsky; E Klapper; J Gil
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 8.  Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, chromatin formation and gene expression in cancer.

Authors:  S B Baylin; M Esteller; M R Rountree; K E Bachman; K Schuebel; J G Herman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Computerized interactive morphometry. An expert system for the diagnosis of lymphoid-rich effusions.

Authors:  A E Walts; A M Marchevsky
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Detection of false-negative Pap smears using the PAPNET system.

Authors:  G M Troni; I Cipparrone; M P Cariaggi; S Ciatto; G Miccinesi; M Zappa; M Confortini
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec
View more
  20 in total

1.  Application of artificial neural network model combined with four biomarkers in auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoran Duan; Yongli Yang; Shanjuan Tan; Sihua Wang; Xiaolei Feng; Liuxin Cui; Feifei Feng; Songcheng Yu; Wei Wang; Yongjun Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  First step toward the "fingerprinting" of brain tumors based on synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence and multiple discriminant analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Szczerbowska-Boruchowska; Marek Lankosz; Dariusz Adamek
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Development of a multiplex methylation specific PCR suitable for (early) detection of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Imran Nawaz; Xiaoming Qiu; Heng Wu; Yang Li; Yaguang Fan; Li-Fu Hu; Qinghua Zhou; Ingemar Ernberg
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 4.  Epigenetic diagnostics of cancer--the application of DNA methylation markers.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Paluszczak; Wanda Baer-Dubowska
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cholangiocarcinoma--an automated preliminary detection system using MLP.

Authors:  Rajasvaran Logeswaran
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Computational Epigenetics: the new scientific paradigm.

Authors:  Shen Jean Lim; Tin Wee Tan; Joo Chuan Tong
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2010-01-23

Review 7.  Computational methods and next-generation sequencing approaches to analyze epigenetics data: Profiling of methods and applications.

Authors:  Itika Arora; Trygve O Tollefsbol
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Classification of lung cancer tumors based on structural and physicochemical properties of proteins by bioinformatics models.

Authors:  Faezeh Hosseinzadeh; Mansour Ebrahimi; Bahram Goliaei; Narges Shamabadi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Identification of women for referral to colposcopy by neural networks: a preliminary study based on LBC and molecular biomarkers.

Authors:  Petros Karakitsos; Charalampos Chrelias; Abraham Pouliakis; George Koliopoulos; Aris Spathis; Maria Kyrgiou; Christos Meristoudis; Aikaterini Chranioti; Christine Kottaridi; George Valasoulis; Ioannis Panayiotides; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-03

10.  Improved classification of lung cancer tumors based on structural and physicochemical properties of proteins using data mining models.

Authors:  R Geetha Ramani; Shomona Gracia Jacob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.