Literature DB >> 14735817

The changes in major limb reconstruction as a result of the development of allografts.

Henry J Mankin1.   

Abstract

Over the past 30 years the author and his colleagues have performed almost 1100 non-pelvic massive cadaveric allografts mostly in the treatment of malignant tumors of bone. The overall results show that 77% of the devices are still functional and competent. The best results were the intercalary grafts (86%) while the poorest were the allograft arthrodeses (61% successful). The complications of fracture and non-union are the principal problems reducing the success rate to 48% and 71% respectively. Primary infection was a major issue but occurred in less than 8% of the cases and reduced the success rate to 72%. Secondary infection following operative procedures to repair fracture or graft non-union occurred in 53 cases and reduced the success rate to less then 30%. No patients died of infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14735817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chir Organi Mov        ISSN: 0009-4749


  10 in total

1.  [Proximal and total femur replacement].

Authors:  P H Pennekamp; D C Wirtz; H R Dürr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Local recurrence, survival and function after total femur resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction for bone sarcomas.

Authors:  Pietro Ruggieri; Giuseppe Bosco; Elisa Pala; Costantino Errani; Mario Mercuri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surgical technique: Computer-generated custom jigs improve accuracy of wide resection of bone tumors.

Authors:  Fazel A Khan; Joseph D Lipman; Andrew D Pearle; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Megaprosthesis versus Condyle-sparing intercalary allograft: distal femoral sarcoma.

Authors:  Melissa N Zimel; Amy M Cizik; Timothy B Rapp; Jason S Weisstein; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Bilateral fibula graft. Biological reconstruction following resection of malignant bone tumors].

Authors:  P-U Tunn; T K Moesta; H Delbrück
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts.

Authors:  Taj M Kattapuram; Deepak K Ozhathil; Francis J Hornicek; Mark C Gebhardt; Henry J Mankin; Andrew E Rosenberg; Susan V Kattapuram
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Endoprosthetic Reconstruction: Saving the Limb-Salvage.

Authors:  Wylie Lopez; Kayoumars Azizpour; Kevin Raskin; Santiago Lozano-Calderón
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

8.  Recurrent GCT of Distal Femur Treated with Resection Arthrodesis with Non-Vascularized Bilateral Fibular Graft and A Custom-Made Interlock Nail.

Authors:  Tuteja Sanesh; Kale Sachin; Chaudhari Prasad; Dhar Sanjay B
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

9.  Bilateral fibular graft: biological reconstruction after resection of primary malignant bone tumors of the lower limb.

Authors:  Maya Niethard; Carmen Tiedke; Dimosthenis Andreou; Frank Traub; Mario Kuhnert; Mathias Werner; Per-Ulf Tunn
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-04-16

10.  Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique.

Authors:  Ajay Lall; Eric Hohn; Mimi Y Kim; Richard G Gorlick; John A Abraham; David S Geller
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2012-12-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.