BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome has been studied, few researchers have prospectively assessed the search tool used to identify cases. METHODS: For 5 months, all patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit in a teaching hospital were evaluated daily to determine whether criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome were met, and physicians' progress notes and discharge summaries for these prospectively identified patients were reviewed for mention of the syndrome. Discharge forms were reviewed for the codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) specific to acute respiratory distress syndrome (518.82 or 518.85). RESULTS: Of 314 patients admitted, 65 prospectively met the criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Of these 65 patients, 31 had acute respiratory distress syndrome mentioned in their progress notes, and 4 of the 31 were subsequently assigned a code of 518.82 or 518.85. Patients with a physician's notation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in their charts had a higher mortality (22/31 [71%]) than did the patients with no such notation (10/34 [29%]). This difference could not be accounted for by differences in length of stay, mean age, score on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, or number of days in the unit before meeting the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome is underestimated when based on either diagnostic coding or physicians' notes without testing of the accuracy of coding. Both physicians and medical record coding specialists may require training in use of terms related to acute respiratory distress syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome has been studied, few researchers have prospectively assessed the search tool used to identify cases. METHODS: For 5 months, all patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit in a teaching hospital were evaluated daily to determine whether criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome were met, and physicians' progress notes and discharge summaries for these prospectively identified patients were reviewed for mention of the syndrome. Discharge forms were reviewed for the codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) specific to acute respiratory distress syndrome (518.82 or 518.85). RESULTS: Of 314 patients admitted, 65 prospectively met the criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Of these 65 patients, 31 had acute respiratory distress syndrome mentioned in their progress notes, and 4 of the 31 were subsequently assigned a code of 518.82 or 518.85. Patients with a physician's notation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in their charts had a higher mortality (22/31 [71%]) than did the patients with no such notation (10/34 [29%]). This difference could not be accounted for by differences in length of stay, mean age, score on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, or number of days in the unit before meeting the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome is underestimated when based on either diagnostic coding or physicians' notes without testing of the accuracy of coding. Both physicians and medical record coding specialists may require training in use of terms related to acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Authors: Scott L Weiss; Julie C Fitzgerald; Edward Vincent Faustino; Marino S Festa; Ericka L Fink; Philippe Jouvet; Jenny L Bush; Niranjan Kissoon; John Marshall; Vinay M Nadkarni; Neal J Thomas Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Majid Afshar; Cara Joyce; Anthony Oakey; Perry Formanek; Philip Yang; Matthew M Churpek; Richard S Cooper; Susan Zelisko; Ron Price; Dmitriy Dligach Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Shannon L Maude; Julie C Fitzgerald; Brian T Fisher; Yimei Li; Yuan-Shung Huang; Kari Torp; Alix E Seif; Marko Kavcic; Dana M Walker; Kateri H Leckerman; Todd J Kilbaugh; Susan R Rheingold; Lillian Sung; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Neal J Thomas; Richard Aplenc Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Luciano B Lemos-Filho; Mark E Mikkelsen; Greg S Martin; Ousama Dabbagh; Adebola Adesanya; Nina Gentile; Annette Esper; Ognjen Gajic; Michelle N Gong Journal: Chest Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jason A Stamm; Bryan J McVerry; Michael A Mathier; Michael P Donahoe; Melissa I Saul; Mark T Gladwin Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2011 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: V Eric Kerchberger; Ryan M Brown; Matthew W Semler; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; David R Janz; Julie A Bastarache; Lorraine B Ware Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-07-06