Literature DB >> 1473419

Normal variation in anorectal manometry.

R L Cali1, G J Blatchford, R E Perry, R M Pitsch, A G Thorson, M A Christensen.   

Abstract

A study was performed to define the normal range of values for anorectal manometry. Normal volunteers were divided according to gender and parity. There were 20 males, 21 nulliparous females, and 18 multiparous females among the 59 subjects. Anorectal manometry using a radial eight-port catheter was performed during resting and squeezing maneuvers of the anal sphincter. Computerized data analysis and three-dimensional imaging were used to calculate sphincter length at rest and squeeze, mean maximum resting and squeeze pressures, and vector symmetry index. The sphincter length at rest and with squeezing in males was significantly greater compared with the two female groups (P < 0.007). Mean maximum squeeze pressures were also significantly elevated in the male group compared with the female groups (P = 0). Mean maximum resting pressures were significantly higher in nulliparous women than in multiparous women (P = 0.04). However, no difference in resting pressures was found between males and nulliparous females. A comparison of the symmetry of the anal canal revealed no differences among the three groups. Ranges for normal anorectal manometry are definable. Normal ranges are distinct for subgroups of patients, particularly with regard to gender and parity. Patients must be compared with their normal subgroups to correctly identify manometric abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1473419     DOI: 10.1007/bf02251969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  11 in total

1.  Effect of gender on the etiology of fecal incontinence: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary referral center in Turkey.

Authors:  Sena Tokay Tarhan; Özlen Atuğ; Adnan Giral; Neşe İmeryüz
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Disturbed anal sphincter function following vaginal delivery.

Authors:  J M Wynne; J L Myles; I Jones; R Sapsford; R E Young; A Hattam; S E Cantamessa
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Normative values in anorectal manometry using microtip technology: a cohort study in 172 subjects.

Authors:  Jochen Schuld; Otto Kollmar; Christian Schlüter; Martin K Schilling; Sven Richter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Topographic and manometric characterization of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex.

Authors:  G Cheeney; M Nguyen; J Valestin; S S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Anal vector volume analysis: an effective tool in the management of pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  M Grande; F Cadeddu; P Sileri; P Ciano; G M Attinà; I Selvaggio; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Anorectal manometric parameters are influenced by gender and age in subjects with normal bowel function.

Authors:  Hyang Ran Lee; Seok-Byung Lim; Jeong Yun Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparison of vector symmetry index and endoanal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of anal sphincter disruption.

Authors:  D N Samarasekera; Y Wright; R H Lowndes; K P Stanley; P Preston; C T M Speakman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Anorectal physiology: test and clinical application.

Authors:  Hyeon-Min Cho
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-10-31

9.  Extensive enteric nervous system abnormalities in mice transgenic for artificial chromosomes containing Parkinson disease-associated alpha-synuclein gene mutations precede central nervous system changes.

Authors:  Yien-Ming Kuo; Zhishan Li; Yun Jiao; Nathalie Gaborit; Amar K Pani; Bonnie M Orrison; Benoit G Bruneau; Benoit I Giasson; Richard J Smeyne; Michael D Gershon; Robert L Nussbaum
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  The position of the patient does not adversely influence the results of the most clinically important measurements of anorectal function.

Authors:  K Yoshioka; M R Keighley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.