Literature DB >> 14728204

Why don't physicians use their personal digital assistants?

Yen-Chiao Lu1, Jin Kyung Lee, Yan Xiao, Andrew Sears, Jacko A Jacko, Kathleen Charters.   

Abstract

As the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) user population continues to expand, there is a need to design more useful devices and applications to facilitate the utilization of PDAs. We conducted a structured interview study to examine PDA usage and non-usage patterns among physicians. The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the barriers that impede physicians in their PDA use. A data collection tool was developed to record: 1) how physicians use their PDAs, 2) functions and applications used, 3) functions and applications not used, 4) reasons and examples of why physicians don't use PDAs for those functions, and 5) the recall of specific incidents of PDA usage using Critical Incident Technique (CIT). Interview data were transcribed and analyzed. Study findings and how those barriers can be addressed are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14728204      PMCID: PMC1480095     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  11 in total

1.  Using handheld computers to document family practice resident procedure experience.

Authors:  R Garvin; F Otto; D McRae
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Mobile information and communication tools in the hospital.

Authors:  E Ammenwerth; A Buchauer; B Bludau; R Haux
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Assistance in the palm of your hand. Portable technology can free physicians from billing and coding chains.

Authors:  P d'Hemecourt
Journal:  Healthc Inform       Date:  2001-06

4.  Handheld computer use in U.S. family practice residency programs.

Authors:  Dan F Criswell; Michael L Parchman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Implementing a personal digital assistant to document clinical interventions by pharmacy residents.

Authors:  J A Brody; J M Camamo; M E Maloney
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 2.637

6.  Evaluating surgical resident selection procedures.

Authors:  M K Gilbart; M D Cusimano; G Regehr
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Using the critical incident technique to define a minimal data set for requirements elicitation in public health.

Authors:  Christina Olvingson; Niklas Hallberg; Toomas Timpka; Robert A Greenes
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  The critical incident technique.

Authors:  J C FLANAGAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Family physicians' preferences for computerized decision-support hardware and software.

Authors:  M H Ebell; D L Gaspar; S Khurana
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Patient reactions to met and unmet psychological need: a critical incident analysis.

Authors:  G Kent; G Wills; A Faulkner; G Parry; M Whipp; R Coleman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1996-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Are physicians likely to adopt emerging mobile technologies? Attitudes and innovation factors affecting smartphone use in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Gavin J Putzer; Yangil Park
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

2.  The effects of innovation factors on smartphone adoption among nurses in community hospitals.

Authors:  Gavin J Putzer; Yangil Park
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-01-01

3.  Integrating multiple clinical information systems using the Java message service framework to enable the delivery of urgent exam results at the point of care.

Authors:  Wyatt M Tellis; Katherine P Andriole
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Direct comparison of a tablet computer and a personal digital assistant for point-of-care documentation in eye care.

Authors:  Garry M Silvey; Jennifer M Macri; Paul P Lee; David F Lobach
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

5.  Development and testing of a scale to assess physician attitudes about handheld computers with decision support.

Authors:  Midge N Ray; Thomas K Houston; Feliciano B Yu; Nir Menachemi; Richard S Maisiak; Jeroan J Allison; Eta S Berner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Top barriers and facilitators to nurses' PDA adoption.

Authors:  Yen-Chiao Lu; Yan Xiao; Mary Etta Mills; Karen Soeken; Vinay Vaidya
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

7.  Group differences in physician responses to handheld presentation of clinical evidence: a verbal protocol analysis.

Authors:  Danielle M Lottridge; Mark Chignell; Romana Danicic-Mizdrak; Nada J Pavlovic; Andre Kushniruk; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review.

Authors:  Anna M Lindquist; Pauline E Johansson; Göran I Petersson; Britt-Inger Saveman; Gunilla C Nilsson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Prospective study of clinician-entered research data in the Emergency Department using an Internet-based system after the HIPAA Privacy Rule.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; Charles L Johnson; William B Webb; Michael S Runyon
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.