Literature DB >> 22737094

Are physicians likely to adopt emerging mobile technologies? Attitudes and innovation factors affecting smartphone use in the Southeastern United States.

Gavin J Putzer1, Yangil Park.   

Abstract

The smartphone has emerged as an important technological device to assist physicians with medical decision making, clinical tasks, and other computing functions. A smartphone is a device that combines mobile telecommunication with Internet accessibility as well as word processing. Moreover, smartphones have additional features such as applications pertinent to clinical medicine and practice management. The purpose of this study was to investigate the innovation factors that affect a physician's decision to adopt an emerging mobile technological device such as a smartphone. The study sample consisted of 103 physicians from community hospitals and academic medical centers in the southeastern United States. Innovation factors are elements that affect an individual's attitude toward using and adopting an emerging technology. In our model, the innovation characteristics of compatibility, job relevance, the internal environment, observability, personal experience, and the external environment were all significant predictors of attitude toward using a smartphone. These influential innovation factors presumably are salient predictors of a physician's attitude toward using a smartphone to assist with clinical tasks. Health information technology devices such as smartphones offer promise as a means to improve clinical efficiency, medical quality, and care coordination and possibly reduce healthcare costs.

Keywords:  health information technology; information systems; innovation factors; physicians; smartphone adoption; strategic health management

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22737094      PMCID: PMC3329206     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  8 in total

1.  Why don't physicians use their personal digital assistants?

Authors:  Yen-Chiao Lu; Jin Kyung Lee; Yan Xiao; Andrew Sears; Jacko A Jacko; Kathleen Charters
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

2.  The effects of innovation factors on smartphone adoption among nurses in community hospitals.

Authors:  Gavin J Putzer; Yangil Park
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 3.  A review on diffusion of personal digital assistants in healthcare.

Authors:  Craig E Kuziemsky; Francis Laul; Raymond C Leung
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  Personal digital assistants in health care: experienced clinicians in the palm of your hand?

Authors:  Daniel C Baumgart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Doctors are getting more tech savvy.

Authors:  Ken Terry
Journal:  Med Econ       Date:  2007-08-03

6.  Technology: cell phones are quickly becoming cutting-edge medical devices.

Authors:  Douglas Page
Journal:  Hosp Health Netw       Date:  2008-08

7.  Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Dimitri A Christakis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys.

Authors:  Chantelle Garritty; Khaled El Emam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total
  36 in total

Review 1.  m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Patrice Ngangue; Julie Payne-Gagnon; Marie Desmartis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Health information: what can mobile phone assessments add?

Authors:  Margareta Warrén Stomberg; Birgitta Platon; Annette Widén; Ingegerd Wallner; Ove Karlsson
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-10-01

3.  Applying Electronic Medical Records in Health Care: Physicians' Perspective.

Authors:  Mohammadhiwa Abdekhoda; Maryam Ahmadi; Afsaneh Dehnad; Alireza Noruzi; Mahmodreza Gohari
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Reciprocal Relationships: the Genetic Counselor-Patient Relationship Following a Life-Limiting Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  S R Williams; K L Berrier; K Redlinger-Grosse; J G Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The promise of wearable sensors and ecological momentary assessment measures for dynamical systems modeling in adolescents: a feasibility and acceptability study.

Authors:  Erin E Brannon; Christopher C Cushing; Christopher J Crick; Tarrah B Mitchell
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Predictors of students' self-reported adoption of a smartphone application for medical education in general practice.

Authors:  Maximilian Sandholzer; Tobias Deutsch; Thomas Frese; Alfred Winter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Mobile technologies: expectancy, usage, and acceptance of clinical staff and patients at a university medical center.

Authors:  Kristin Illiger; Markus Hupka; Ute von Jan; Daniel Wichelhaus; Urs-Vito Albrecht
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  An analysis of the development and implementation of a smartphone application for the delivery of antimicrobial prescribing policy: lessons learnt.

Authors:  E Charani; Y Kyratsis; W Lawson; H Wickens; E T Brannigan; L S P Moore; A H Holmes
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Healthcare provider perceptions of clinical prediction rules.

Authors:  Safiya Richardson; Sundas Khan; Lauren McCullagh; Myriam Kline; Devin Mann; Thomas McGinn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Do smartphone applications in healthcare require a governance and legal framework? It depends on the application!

Authors:  Esmita Charani; Enrique Castro-Sánchez; Luke S P Moore; Alison Holmes
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.