Literature DB >> 14726298

Virtual electrode theory explains pacing threshold increase caused by cardiac tissue damage.

Aleksandre T Sambelashvili1, Vladimir P Nikolski, Igor R Efimov.   

Abstract

The virtual electrode polarization (VEP) effect is believed to play a key role in electrical stimulation of heart muscle. However, under certain conditions, including clinically, its existence and importance remain unknown. We investigated the influence of acute tissue damage produced by continuous pacing with strong current (40-mA, 4-ms biphasic pulses with 4-Hz frequency for 5 min) on stimulus-generated VEPs and pacing thresholds. A fluorescent optical mapping technique was used to obtain stimulus-induced transmembrane potential distribution around a pacing electrode applied to the ventricular surface of a Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart (n = 5). Maps and pacing thresholds were recorded before and after tissue damage. Spatial extents of electroporation and cell uncoupling were assessed by propidium iodide (n = 2) and connexin43 (n = 3) antibody staining, respectively. On the basis of these data, passive and active three-dimensional bidomain models were built to determine VEP patterns and thresholds for different-sized areas of the damaged region. Electrophysiological results showed that acute tissue damage led to disappearance of the VEP with an associated significant increase in pacing thresholds. Damage was expressed in electroporation and cell uncoupling within an approximately 1.0-mm-diameter area around the tip of the electrode. According to computer simulations, cell uncoupling, rather than electroporation, might be the direct cause of VEP elimination and threshold increase, which was nonlinearly dependent on the size of the damaged region. Fiber rotation with depth did not substantially affect the numerical results. The study explains failure to stimulate damaged tissue within the concepts of the VEP theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14726298     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00637.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  14 in total

1.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell.

Authors:  Wanda Krassowska; Petar D Filev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Cardiomyocyte lethality by multidirectional stimuli.

Authors:  José Américo Nabuco Leva Ferreira de Freitas; Fernanda Dos Santos Costa Leomil; Marcelo Zoccoler; Priscila Correia Antoneli; Pedro Xavier de Oliveira
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Physiological mechanisms of QRS narrowing in bundle branch block patients undergoing permanent His bundle pacing.

Authors:  Alexandra E Teng; Louis Massoud; Olujimi A Ajijola
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Low energy defibrillation in human cardiac tissue: a simulation study.

Authors:  Stuart W Morgan; Gernot Plank; Irina V Biktasheva; Vadim N Biktashev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Termination of atrial fibrillation using pulsed low-energy far-field stimulation.

Authors:  Flavio H Fenton; Stefan Luther; Elizabeth M Cherry; Niels F Otani; Valentin Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Robert F Gilmour
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Spatial distribution and extent of electroporation by strong internal shock in intact structurally normal and chronically infarcted rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Seok C Kim; Amit Vasanji; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-05-09

9.  Low-energy control of electrical turbulence in the heart.

Authors:  Stefan Luther; Flavio H Fenton; Bruce G Kornreich; Amgad Squires; Philip Bittihn; Daniel Hornung; Markus Zabel; James Flanders; Andrea Gladuli; Luis Campoy; Elizabeth M Cherry; Gisa Luther; Gerd Hasenfuss; Valentin I Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Robert F Gilmour; Eberhard Bodenschatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Time course of current of injury is related to acute stability of active-fixation pacing leads in rabbits.

Authors:  Shalaimaiti Shali; Alimujiang Wushou; Entao Liu; Lin Jia; Ruiming Yao; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.