Literature DB >> 29845489

Cardiomyocyte lethality by multidirectional stimuli.

José Américo Nabuco Leva Ferreira de Freitas1, Fernanda Dos Santos Costa Leomil1, Marcelo Zoccoler2, Priscila Correia Antoneli1, Pedro Xavier de Oliveira1,3.   

Abstract

Multidirectional defibrillation protocols have shown better efficiency than monodirectional; still, no testing was performed to assess cell lethality. We investigated lethality of multidirectional defibrillator-like shocks on isolated cardiomyocytes. Cells were isolated from adult male Wistar rats and plated into a perfusion chamber. Electrical field stimulation threshold (ET) was obtained, and cells were paced with suprathreshold bipolar electrical field (E) pulses. Either one monodirectional high-intensity electrical field (HEF) pulse aligned at 0° (group Mono0) or 60° (group Mono60) to cell major axis or a multidirectional sequence of three HEF pulses aligned at 0°, 60°, and 120° each was applied. If cell recovered from shock, pacing was resumed, and a higher amplitude HEF, proportional to ET, was applied. The sequence was repeated until cell death. Lethality curves were built by means of survival analysis from sub-lethal and lethal E. Non-linear fit was performed, and E values corresponding to 50% probability of lethality (E50) were compared. Multidirectional groups presented lethality curves similar to Mono0. Mono60 displayed the highest E50. The novel data endorse the idea of multidirectional stimuli being safer because their effects on lethality of individual cells were equal to a single monodirectional stimulus, while their defibrillatory threshold is lower. Graphical abstract Monodirectional and multidirectional lethality protocol comparison on isolated rat cardiomyocytes. The heart image is a derivative of "3D Heart in zBrush" ( https://vimeo.com/65568770 ) by Laloxl, used under CC BY 3.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode )/image extracted from original video.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defibrillation; Electrical field stimulation; Isolated ventricular myocytes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29845489     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1848-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  26 in total

1.  Quantitative study of electroporation-mediated molecular uptake and cell viability.

Authors:  P J Canatella; J F Karr; J A Petros; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The role of electroporation in defibrillation.

Authors:  A Al-Khadra; V Nikolski; I R Efimov
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2000-10-27       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  The mechanism of electrical breakdown in the membranes of Valonai utricularis.

Authors:  H G Coster; U Simmermann
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1975-06-03       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Ventricular myocyte injury by high-intensity electric field: Effect of pulse duration.

Authors:  Luiza Ns Prado; Jair T Goulart; Marcelo Zoccoler; Pedro X Oliveira
Journal:  Gen Physiol Biophys       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.512

5.  Encircling overlapping multipulse shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation.

Authors:  L A Pagan-Carlo; J J Allan; K T Spencer; C L Birkett; R Myers; R E Kerber
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Cell membrane resealing by a vesicular mechanism similar to neurotransmitter release.

Authors:  R A Steinhardt; G Bi; J M Alderton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Molecular basis for cell membrane electroporation.

Authors:  J C Weaver
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1994-05-31       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Incidence and outcomes of rearrest following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  David D Salcido; Matthew L Sundermann; Allison C Koller; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.

Authors:  D Exner; R Yee; D L Jones; G J Klein; R Mehra
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  The mechanism of facilitated cell membrane resealing.

Authors:  T Togo; J M Alderton; G Q Bi; R A Steinhardt
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.