Literature DB >> 14724145

Studies of acid exposure immediately above the gastro-oesophageal squamocolumnar junction: evidence of short segment reflux.

J Fletcher1, A Wirz, E Henry, K E L McColl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Oesophageal pH is conventionally recorded from a point 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter. However, the mucosal changes of reflux oesophagitis and intestinal metaplasia tend to affect the segment of oesophagus distal to this and close to the squamocolumnar junction. This study set out to investigate oesophageal acid exposure of squamous mucosa close to the squamocolumnar junction.
METHODS: Dual channel 24 hour pH monitoring was carried out in 11 patients with endoscopy negative dyspepsia and no evidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux by conventional oesophageal pH metry. Oesophageal pH was recorded from electrodes positioned 5 mm and 55 mm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction. A novel technique was developed using metal clips to secure the pH catheter to the oesophageal mucosa and maintain these electrode positions. Oesophageal manometry indicated that the distal electrode was within the high pressure zone of the lower oesophageal sphincter.
RESULTS: We found that 24 hour oesophageal acid exposure (per cent time pH <4) was greater 5 mm above the squamocolumnar junction compared with the conventional position 5 cm more proximal (11.7% v 1.8%; p<0.001). The greater acid exposure at the distal versus the conventional site was apparent in both the upright (12.7% v 2.3%) and supine (10.5% v 1.3%) positions, as well as during preprandial (14.2% v 1.6%) and postprandial (21.8% v 2.8%) periods (p<0.001 for each). The number of reflux events recorded close to the squamocolumnar junction was also higher than at the conventional position (168 v 33; p<0.001). There was no correlation between acid exposure at the two sites.
CONCLUSIONS: The squamous mucosa of the most distal oesophagus is exposed to substantial acidic reflux, even in patients without evidence of conventional reflux disease. This short segment reflux may explain the high incidence of metaplasia and neoplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14724145      PMCID: PMC1774939          DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.022160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  31 in total

1.  Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D L Decktor; S H Krawet; S L Rodriguez; M Robinson; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.

Authors:  R K Mittal; R H Holloway; R Penagini; L A Blackshaw; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Location of the lower oesophageal sphincter and the squamous columnar mucosal junction in 109 healthy controls and 778 patients with different degrees of endoscopic oesophagitis.

Authors:  A Csendes; F Maluenda; I Braghetto; P Csendes; A Henriquez; M S Quesada
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects.

Authors:  M N Schoeman; M D Tippett; L M Akkermans; J Dent; R H Holloway
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Simultaneous two level oesophageal pH monitoring in healthy controls and patients with oesophagitis: comparison between two positions.

Authors:  P Singh; R H Taylor; D G Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction.

Authors:  S J Spechler; J M Zeroogian; D A Antonioli; H H Wang; R K Goyal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-03       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The relation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment to adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia.

Authors:  W H Chow; W D Finkle; J K McLaughlin; H Frankl; H K Ziel; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Attenuation of esophageal shortening during peristalsis with hiatus hernia.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; S Wu; S Lin; P Pouderoux
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Dynamic characteristic of gastro-oesophageal reflux in ambulatory patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and normal control subjects.

Authors:  B L Weusten; L M Akkermans; G P vanBerge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  28 in total

1.  Are we underestimating acid reflux?

Authors:  S J Spechler
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Short segment reflux: acid but no pocket?

Authors:  S Nandurkar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Barrett esophagus: an update.

Authors:  Rami J Badreddine; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different?

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; Q Zhang; M A Schreiner; S Ghosh; M P Roth; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Relevance of volume and proximal extent of reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D Sifrim
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Bravo wireless versus catheter pH monitoring systems.

Authors:  M Fox
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  The value of esophageal histology in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with heartburn and normal endoscopy.

Authors:  Guido N J Tytgat
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06

8.  Regional postprandial differences in pH within the stomach and gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Hrair P Simonian; Lien Vo; Siva Doma; Robert S Fisher; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket and its association with gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Nian; Xian-Mei Meng; Jing Wu; Fu-Chu Jing; Xue-Qin Wang; Tong Dang; Jun Zhang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Lower oesophageal sphincter identification for gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: The step-up method revisited with use of basal impedance.

Authors:  Aurelio Mauro; Marianna Franchina; Dario Consonni; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.