Literature DB >> 8150336

Simultaneous two level oesophageal pH monitoring in healthy controls and patients with oesophagitis: comparison between two positions.

P Singh1, R H Taylor, D G Colin-Jones.   

Abstract

For oesophageal pH monitoring, the pH probe is usually positioned 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS). This is by convention, and has not been compared with other positions in its ability to discriminate between physiological and abnormal acid reflux. Using simultaneous two level 24 hour pH monitoring (5 and 10 cm above manometrically determined LOS) in 31 controls and 51 patients with reflux oesophagitis, the significance of the precise position of the probe in the oesophagus was examined. Secondly, this study compared the discrimination between the two groups achieved at the two levels. Patients had greater acid exposure than controls at both levels. In controls, acid exposure was greater at distal than at the proximal level except the supine acid exposure, which was similar at both levels. In patients, acid exposure was greater at the distal level for all variables (median % of total time pH < 4 = 11.7 v 7.6; p = 0.001). There was excellent correlation between the two levels for all variables in controls (r = 0.883, 0.935, 0.813, and p < 0.001 for percentage of time pH < 4 for total, supine, and upright times) as well as in patients (r = 0.848, 0.848, 0.779, and p < 0.001). On discriminant and receiver operating characteristic analysis, pH threshold 4 seemed as good as or better than other pH thresholds in discriminating between controls and patients. The percentage of total time pH below 4 seemed to discriminate as well or better than other variables at both levels. The distal level (5 cm above LOS) provided slightly better discrimination than proximal level (10 cm) (percentage of subjects correctly classified=81.7 v 75.6). The critical factor for the reliability of the test is not the precise position of the pH probe relative to the LOS, but that the same position is consistently used in patients and controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8150336      PMCID: PMC1374579          DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.3.304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  21 in total

1.  Perceptual and statistical analysis of cardiac phase and amplitude images.

Authors:  A Houston; A Craig
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

2.  Ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with hoarseness.

Authors:  P O Katz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Histamine-2-receptor antagonists in gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D G Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Computerized ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in 50 asymptomatic volunteer subjects. Results and clinical implications.

Authors:  W G Cheadle; G C Vitale; S A Sadek; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  24-hour monitoring of oesophageal pH in outpatients.

Authors:  T C Dehn; M Kettlewell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Is 24 h ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring useful in a district general hospital?

Authors:  I P Donald; G A Ford; S P Wilkinson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; P E Isberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Determination of criteria and relation to endoscopy.

Authors:  A A Masclee; A C de Best; R de Graaf; O J Cluysenaer; J B Jansen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Daytime gastro-oesophageal reflux is important in oesophagitis.

Authors:  J S de Caestecker; J N Blackwell; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Oesophageal motor function before and after healing of oesophagitis.

Authors:  P Singh; A Adamopoulos; R H Taylor; D G Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of reflux disease.

Authors:  N I McDougall
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Is laryngopharyngeal reflux an important risk factor in the development of laryngeal carcinoma?

Authors:  Samet Ozlugedik; Irfan Yorulmaz; Kursat Gokcan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Studies of acid exposure immediately above the gastro-oesophageal squamocolumnar junction: evidence of short segment reflux.

Authors:  J Fletcher; A Wirz; E Henry; K E L McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.