Literature DB >> 2058875

Assessment of competency: the role of neurobehavioral deficits.

M Freedman1, D T Stuss, M Gordon.   

Abstract

We present a practical set of guidelines for assessing competency in patients with cognitive deficits due to neurologic disorders such as stroke, head injury, Alzheimer disease, and multi-infarct dementia. Our focus is the evaluation of cognitive processes underlying the ability to make competent decisions, with an emphasis on the identification of areas of preserved function that may be used to bypass intellectual deficits. The assessment of the cognitive processes underlying competency involves a series of steps designed to evaluate attention, language, memory, and frontal lobe function. The examiner must first show that the patient has an adequate level of attention for participation in the further testing of specific cognitive functions; second, that the patient is able to comprehend relevant instructions, retain information long enough to evaluate it in relation to relevant recent and remote experiences, and express his or her wishes; and finally, that the patient has sufficiently intact judgment and awareness. The examiner must determine whether the patient's preserved cognitive abilities are sufficient for him or her to make an adequate judgment in relation to the specific question being asked. If cognitive function is found to be significantly impaired, the examiner should do a detailed assessment for the presence of compensatory abilities that can be used to bypass the deficits. For example, the examiner should assess whether patients who cannot speak are still able to express their wishes by pointing, using gesture, or even by drawing pictures. Unless such an assessment has been done, patients should not be considered incompetent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2058875     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-3-203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  6 in total

1.  [Mental competence and neuropsychologic impairments in demented patients].

Authors:  J Vollmann; K-P Kühl; A Tilmann; H D Hartung; H Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Death can be proud.

Authors:  L Butt; J Rothman
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1995 Mar-May

3.  Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment.

Authors:  E Etchells; P Darzins; M Silberfeld; P A Singer; J McKenny; G Naglie; M Katz; G H Guyatt; D W Molloy; D Strang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Criteria for patient decision making (in)competence: a review of and commentary on some empirical approaches.

Authors:  S P Welie
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

Review 5.  Bioethics for clinicians: 3. Capacity.

Authors:  E Etchells; G Sharpe; C Elliott; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Clinical assessment of decision-making capacity in acquired brain injury with personality change.

Authors:  Gareth S Owen; Fabian Freyenhagen; Wayne Martin; Anthony S David
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.868

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.