Literature DB >> 14722416

Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain.

Francisco M Kovacs1, Víctor Abraira, Javier Zamora, María Teresa Gil del Real, Joan Llobera, Carmen Fernández, José Ramón Bauza, Kunibert Bauza, Josep Coll, María Cuadri, Elena Duro, Juan Gili, Mario Gestoso, Marina Gómez, Juana González, Patricia Ibañez, Antoni Jover, Pablo Lázaro, Miguel Llinás, Catalina Mateu, Nicole Mufraggi, Alfonso Muriel, Carmen Nicolau, María Arrate Olivera, Patricia Pascual, Lourdes Perelló, Francisco Pozo, Teresa Revuelta, Vicente Reyes, Sebestián Ribot, Jaime Ripoll, Juana Ripoll, Elena Rodríguez.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Correlation among previously validated questionnaires.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Roland-Morris (RMQ), Oswestry (OQ), and EuroQol (EQ) Questionnaires are validated instruments to assess pain, low back pain-related disability, and quality of life.
METHODS: The study was done in the primary care setting, in Mallorca, with 195 patients who visited their physician for LBP. Individuals were given the VAS, RMQ, OQ, and EQ on their first visit and 14 days later.
RESULTS: Median duration of pain when entering the study was 10 days (P25,P75: 3, 40). On day 1, simple correlation was r = 0.347 between VAS and RMQ, r = -0.422 between VAS and EQ, and r = -0.442 between RMQ and EQ. On day 15, simple correlation was r = 0.570 between VAS and RMQ, r = -0.672 between VAS and EQ, and r = -0.637 between RMQ and EQ. Multiple linear regression models showed that, on day 1, the VAS score explains 12% of the RMQ score and the VAS and RMQ scores explain 27% of the EQ score. On day 15, the VAS score explains 33% of the RMQ score, and the VAS and RMQ scores explain 58% of the EQ score. On day 1, a 10% increase in VAS worsens disability by 3.3% and quality of life by 2.65%. On day 15, a 10% increase in VAS worsens disability by 4.99% and quality of life by 3.80%. Prestudy duration of pain had no influence on any model. All these correlation coefficients and models are significant at the P < 0.001 level. The OQ had lower correlation values with the other three scales, and only two of them were significant.
CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant improvements in pain may lead to almost unnoticeable changes in disability and quality of life. Therefore, these variables should be assessed separately when evaluating the effect of any form of treatment for low back pain. The influence of pain and disability on quality of life progresses while they last, and doubles in 14 days. In acute and subacute patients, this increase is not dependent on the previous duration of pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14722416     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000107235.47465.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  46 in total

1.  [Pilot study on pain response patterns in chronic low back pain. The influence of pain response patterns on quality of life, pain intensity and disability].

Authors:  S L Scholich; D Hallner; R H Wittenberg; A C Rusu; M I Hasenbring
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  The social tariff of EQ-5D is not adequate to assess quality of life in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Javier Zamora; Francisco Kovacs; Víctor Abraira; Carmen Fernández; Pablo Lázaro
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Well-being outcomes of chiropractic intervention for lower back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lynne Parkinson; David Sibbritt; Philip Bolton; Joan van Rotterdam; Inger Villadsen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Development of the Italian version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score (mJOA-IT): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Alessandra Berton; Luca Denaro; Giuseppe Salvatore; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hansson; Tommy Hansson; Robert Jonsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Patient-centered evaluation of outcomes from rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders: the impact of personal goal achievement on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Rowland G Hazard; Kevin F Spratt; Christine M McDonough; Colleen M Olson; Elizabeth S Ossen; Eric M Hartmann; Raynee J Carlson; Jenna LaVoie
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Spanish adaptation of the Quality of Life Index-Spinal Cord Injury version.

Authors:  F M Kovacs; A Barriga; A Royuela; J Seco; J Zamora
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Understanding Pain and Depression in Back Pain: the Role of Catastrophizing, Help-/Hopelessness, and Thought Suppression as Potential Mediators.

Authors:  Janina Hülsebusch; Monika I Hasenbring; Adina C Rusu
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-06

9.  The German PASS-20 in patients with low back pain: new aspects of convergent, divergent, and criterion-related validity.

Authors:  Nina Kreddig; Adina C Rusu; Katja Burkhardt; Monika I Hasenbring
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-04

10.  Satisfaction with Life in Orofacial Pain Disorders: Associations and Theoretical Implications.

Authors:  Ian A Boggero; Marcia V Rojas-Ramirez; Reny de Leeuw; Charles R Carlson
Journal:  J Oral Facial Pain Headache       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.