Literature DB >> 14716042

Nonresponders to osteoporosis therapy.

E Michael Lewiecki1.   

Abstract

The goal of osteoporosis therapy is reduction of fracture risk. In randomized controlled trials, relative risk of fracture is determined by comparing the absolute fracture rate of a treatment group to a control group. Fracture risk cannot be measured in individual patients being treated for osteoporosis. Since osteoporosis is a silent disease, and some patients may not respond to therapy, a surrogate test for reduction of fracture risk is often used-most commonly a bone density test. A proposed definition of nonresponse is: A decrease in bone mineral density greater than the Least Significant Change at the 95% level of confidence. The Least Significant Change is a value based on bone density measurements in patients and calculated according to well-established standards. There are other candidates for measuring responsiveness to therapy, most notably biochemical markers of bone metabolism, but none is as well validated or standardized as bone density testing. Causes of nonresponse include poor adherence, co-morbid conditions, calcium and vitamin D deficiency, malabsorption, metabolic factors, wrong dose, wrong dosing interval, and lack of efficacy. A bone density increase or stability of bone density is associated with fracture risk reduction in approved osteoporosis therapies, while a bone density decrease is cause for clinical concern. The proposed definition of nonresponse identifies a subset of patients who may require a change of therapy and/or additional medical intervention. More data are needed to develop guidelines for clinicians. Further study is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14716042     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:6:4:307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  26 in total

1.  Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.

Authors:  M W Aref; E M B McNerny; D Brown; K J Jepsen; M R Allen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Engraftment and bone mass are enhanced by PTHrP 1-34 in ectopically transplanted vertebrae (vossicle model) and can be non-invasively monitored with bioluminescence and fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Blake Eason Hildreth; Michelle M Williams; Katarzyna A Dembek; Krista M Hernon; Thomas J Rosol; Ramiro E Toribio
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  [Antiosteoporosis medication: useful monitoring, and how long should such treatment be continued?].

Authors:  W Demary
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  Update on bone density testing.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Bone Mineral Density Response from Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  So-Young Kim; Meng Zhang; Richard Bockman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  Prevalence of vitamin D depletion among subjects seeking advice on osteoporosis: a five-year cross-sectional study with public health implications.

Authors:  G Guardia; N Parikh; T Eskridge; E Phillips; G Divine; D Sudhaker Rao
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis: insights for clinicians.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Monthly ibandronate suppresses serum CTX-I within 3 days and maintains a monthly fluctuating pattern of suppression.

Authors:  N Binkley; S L Silverman; C Simonelli; N Santiago; J D Kohles; G Dasic; J A Sunyecz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Genetic polymorphism of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (GGSP1) predicts bone density response to bisphosphonate therapy in Korean women.

Authors:  Hyung Jin Choi; Ji Yeob Choi; Sun Wook Cho; Daehee Kang; Ki Ok Han; Sang Wan Kim; Seong Yeon Kim; Yoon-Sok Chung; Chan Soo Shin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.