Literature DB >> 14714845

Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.

Bernt Andersson1, Roland Glauser, Michele Maglione, Asa Taylor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized, controlled 5-year multicenter study evaluated the long-term clinical function of CerAdapt ceramic abutments compared to titanium abutments on Brånemark implants supporting short-span fixed partial dentures (FPD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initially, 105 Brånemark implants were placed in a total of 32 patients at three different clinics; 103 implants remained after initial healing. Fifty-three ceramic and 50 titanium abutments were connected to support 36 FPDs, 19 on ceramic and 17 on titanium abutments.
RESULTS: Thirty patients with 29 FPDs were examined after 5 years. There was a cumulative success rate of 97.2% for FPDs (94.7% for ceramic and 100% for titanium abutment-supported FPDs). One of 53 ceramic and none of 50 titanium abutments failed, giving survival rates of 98.1% and 100%, respectively. There was a mean marginal bone loss of 0.3 mm and 0.4 mm, respectively, for ceramic and titanium abutments. Soft tissues around abutments and adjacent teeth appeared healthy, and no significant differences were recorded for mucosal bleeding and plaque between ceramic and titanium abutments. Crown margins at FPD insertion were positioned as follows: 21% submucosally, 33% at the mucosal margin, and 46% supramucosally. Changes in mucosal level were recorded at 12% of the abutments, with 73% of all changes recorded at ceramic abutments. There was a balance between more or less exposed crown margins during the first 2 years, in contrast to the 2- to 5-year period, when all changes meant less exposed margins.
CONCLUSION: Safe long-term functional and esthetic results can be achieved with CerAdapt alumina ceramic abutments on Brånemark implants for short-span FPDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14714845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  11 in total

Review 1.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition.

Authors:  Elliot Abt; Alan B Carr; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-17

2.  Fracture behavior of straight or angulated zirconia implant abutments supporting anterior single crowns.

Authors:  Frank P Nothdurft; Klaus E Doppler; Kurt J Erdelt; Andreas W Knauber; Peter R Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments.

Authors:  Frank Philipp Nothdurft; Sabine Merker; Peter Reinhard Pospiech
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Interaction of titanium, zirconia and lithium disilicate with peri-implant soft tissue: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Katharina Kuhn; Heike Rudolph; Michael Graf; Matthias Moldan; Shaoxia Zhou; Martin Udart; Andrea Böhmler; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Niloufar Mousavi; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Correlation between abutment angulation and off-axial stresses on biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconium implants in the anterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Harilal Guguloth; Chalapathi Rao Duggineni; Ravi Kumar Chitturi; M Sujesh; T Ravvali; Roja Roshan Amiti
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10

7.  Enhancement of Gingival Tissue Adherence of Zirconia Implant Posts: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Alexandra Zühlke; Michael Gasik; Khalil Shahramian; Timo Närhi; Yevgen Bilotsky; Ilkka Kangasniemi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Comparisons of maximum deformation and failure forces at the implant-abutment interface of titanium implants between titanium-alloy and zirconia abutments with two levels of marginal bone loss.

Authors:  Chiung-Fang Wang; Heng-Li Huang; Dan-Jae Lin; Yen-Wen Shen; Lih-Jyh Fuh; Jui-Ting Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Soft Tissue Response to Titanium Abutments with Different Surface Treatment: Preliminary Histologic Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Luigi Canullo; Jan Friedrich Dehner; David Penarrocha; Vittorio Checchi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Lorenzo Breschi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Effects of modified abutment characteristics on peri-implant soft tissue health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Sanz-Martín; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Ana Carrillo de Albornoz; Elena Figuero; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.