Literature DB >> 14713406

Is it ethical to use placebos in osteoporosis clinical trials?

Nelson B Watts1.   

Abstract

Because there are now effective agents for treatment of osteoporosis, the question is being raised as to whether or not it is ethical to have placebo-controlled trials of new agents. It is ethical for patients who are at low risk of serious or irreversible harm to participate in placebo-controlled trials as long as they provide informed consent. Morbidity, mortality, and future fracture risk correlate with the presence of previous fractures, the number of previous fractures, whether or not the fracture is recent, and whether or not the fracture is clinically recognized. Lower-risk subjects who may be allowed to participate in placebo-controlled trials include those with low bone density but without a previous vertebral fracture, those with a single vertebral deformity that was not clinically recognized, and those with a vertebral fracture more than 2 years before. Higher-risk subjects who do not tolerate proven drugs or who have not responded to proven drugs may also participate. Even though it may be ethical for selected subjects to participate in placebo-controlled trials of new therapies for osteoporosis, steps should be taken to minimize their exposure (eg, unbalanced randomization, integration of outcomes, and powering trials to actual events rather than a projected number over 3 years), and treating patients who fracture or who fail to respond.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14713406     DOI: 10.1007/s11926-004-0087-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3774            Impact factor:   4.592


  33 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of randomized clinical trials. Proposed alternative designs.

Authors:  T J Cleophas; A H Zwinderman
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 2: practical issues and specific cases.

Authors:  S S Ellenberg; R Temple
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group.

Authors:  C H Chesnut; S Silverman; K Andriano; H Genant; A Gimona; S Harris; D Kiel; M LeBoff; M Maricic; P Miller; C Moniz; M Peacock; P Richardson; N Watts; D Baylink
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Study subjects and ordinary patients.

Authors:  R Dowd; R R Recker; R P Heaney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Correcting calcium nutritional deficiency prevents spine fractures in elderly women.

Authors:  R R Recker; S Hinders; K M Davies; R P Heaney; M R Stegman; J M Lappe; D B Kimmel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D M Kado; W S Browner; L Palermo; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-06-14

8.  Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy.

Authors:  Somnath Sarkar; Bruce H Mitlak; Mayme Wong; John L Stock; Dennis M Black; Kristine D Harper
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate.

Authors:  R Eastell; I Barton; R A Hannon; A Chines; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictive Performance of the FRAX Tool Calibrated for Spain vs. an Age and Sex Model: Prospective Cohort Study with 9082 Women and Men Followed for up to 8 Years.

Authors:  Aníbal García-Sempere; Isabel Hurtado; Salvador Peiró; Francisco Sánchez-Sáez; Yared Santaana; Clara Rodríguez-Bernal; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; José Sanfélix-Genovés
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.