Literature DB >> 14710962

Reversible-figure perception: mechanisms of intentional control.

Thomas C Toppino1.   

Abstract

Observers can exert a degree of intentional control over the perception of reversible figures. Also, the portion of the stimulus that is selected for primary or enhanced processing (focal-feature processing) influences how observers perceive a reversible figure. Two experiments investigated whether voluntary control over perception of a Necker cube could be explained in terms of intentionally selecting appropriate focal features within the stimulus for primary processing. In Experiment 1, varying observers' intentions and the focus of primary processing produced additive effects on the percentage of time that one alternative was perceived. In Experiment 2, the effect of varying the focus of primary processing was eliminated by the use of a small cube, but the effect of intention was unaltered. The results indicate that intentional control over perception can be exerted independently of focal-feature processing, perhaps by top-down activation or priming of perceptual representations. The results also reveal the limits of intentional control.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14710962     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  30 in total

1.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Amanda L Parker; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Can you experience 'top-down' effects on perception?: The case of race categories and perceived lightness.

Authors:  Chaz Firestone; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  When can attention influence binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Precisely timed oculomotor and parietal EEG activity in perceptual switching.

Authors:  Hironori Nakatani; Nicoletta Orlandi; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Disambiguating Necker cube rotation using a location cue: what types of spatial location signal can the visual system learn?

Authors:  Sarah Harrison; Benjamin Backus
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 9.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations.

Authors:  Johan Wagemans; Jacob Feldman; Sergei Gepshtein; Ruth Kimchi; James R Pomerantz; Peter A van der Helm; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Selective biasing of a specific bistable-figure percept involves fMRI signal changes in frontostriatal circuits: a step toward unlocking the neural correlates of top-down control and self-regulation.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Melissa Lamar; Jason T Buhle; Michael J Kane; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.