AIMS: First-degree relatives of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are often reported to be insulin resistant. We wanted to identify early metabolic abnormalities in this condition, and determine whether they are altered by regular physical training. METHODS: We measured insulin sensitivity using the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique and insulin response to oral glucose in 10 unfit (did not participate in routine physical exercise) offspring of T2DM parents and 10 unfit control subjects, and compared them with six fit (routinely swam for 3 h/day 5 days/week) offspring of T2DM parents and six fit controls with no family history of T2DM. RESULTS: Unfit offspring had a higher plasma glucose response than the other three groups. The mean area under the glucose curve was also significantly higher in unfit offspring than in the other three groups (12.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 10.4 +/- 0.4, 9.6 +/- 0.5, and 9.5 +/- 0.7 mmol/l per hour for the unfit controls, fit offspring and fit controls, respectively; P < 0.05). The corresponding insulin response of unfit offspring was significantly higher at 60 min in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) that that of fit offspring or fit controls. In addition, the mean area under the insulin curve was significantly greater in unfit offspring than in either fit offspring or fit controls (868 +/- 172 vs. 294 +/- 71, 287 +/- 43 mmol/l per hour, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreover, the glucose disposal rate (GDR), measured using a euglycaemic clamp, was significantly lower in unfit and fit offspring than in unfit and fit controls (5.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 8.6 +/- 0.3 mg/kg per minute; P < 0.01 and 9.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 12.1 +/- 0.8 mg/kg per minute, respectively; P < 0.015), whereas the GDR was similar in unfit controls and fit offspring (8.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 9.3 +/- 0.9 mg/kg per minute; P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results support the concept that early metabolic abnormalities, as reflected by a decreased GDR (insulin sensitivity) in the offspring of T2DM patients, may be improved by increased physical fitness.
AIMS: First-degree relatives of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are often reported to be insulin resistant. We wanted to identify early metabolic abnormalities in this condition, and determine whether they are altered by regular physical training. METHODS: We measured insulin sensitivity using the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique and insulin response to oral glucose in 10 unfit (did not participate in routine physical exercise) offspring of T2DM parents and 10 unfit control subjects, and compared them with six fit (routinely swam for 3 h/day 5 days/week) offspring of T2DM parents and six fit controls with no family history of T2DM. RESULTS: Unfit offspring had a higher plasma glucose response than the other three groups. The mean area under the glucose curve was also significantly higher in unfit offspring than in the other three groups (12.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 10.4 +/- 0.4, 9.6 +/- 0.5, and 9.5 +/- 0.7 mmol/l per hour for the unfit controls, fit offspring and fit controls, respectively; P < 0.05). The corresponding insulin response of unfit offspring was significantly higher at 60 min in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) that that of fit offspring or fit controls. In addition, the mean area under the insulin curve was significantly greater in unfit offspring than in either fit offspring or fit controls (868 +/- 172 vs. 294 +/- 71, 287 +/- 43 mmol/l per hour, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreover, the glucose disposal rate (GDR), measured using a euglycaemic clamp, was significantly lower in unfit and fit offspring than in unfit and fit controls (5.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 8.6 +/- 0.3 mg/kg per minute; P < 0.01 and 9.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 12.1 +/- 0.8 mg/kg per minute, respectively; P < 0.015), whereas the GDR was similar in unfit controls and fit offspring (8.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 9.3 +/- 0.9 mg/kg per minute; P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results support the concept that early metabolic abnormalities, as reflected by a decreased GDR (insulin sensitivity) in the offspring of T2DM patients, may be improved by increased physical fitness.
Authors: Sarah J Lessard; Donato A Rivas; Erin J Stephenson; Ben B Yaspelkis; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; John A Hawley Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: G Ntali; C Koutsari; K Karakike; P Makras; F Skopouli; M Mc Milan; C Slater; S Higgins; A Zampelas; D Malkova Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: N D Barwell; D Malkova; C N Moran; S J Cleland; C J Packard; V A Zammit; J M R Gill Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Mika Takeuchi; Bin Wu; Mari Honda; Ayaka Tsuboi; Kaori Kitaoka; Satomi Minato; Miki Kurata; Tsutomu Kazumi; Keisuke Fukuo Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-05