AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Sedentary offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes are often more insulin-resistant than persons with no family history of diabetes, but when active or fit offspring of type 2 diabetic patients are compared with non-diabetic persons, differences in insulin resistance are less evident. This study aimed to determine the effects of an exercise training intervention on insulin sensitivity in both groups. METHODS:Women offspring (n = 34) of type 2 diabetic patients (offspring age 35.6 +/- 7.0 years, BMI 28.1 +/- 5.1 kg/m(2)) and 36 matched female controls (age 33.6 +/- 6.1 years, BMI 27.3 +/- 4.7 kg/m(2)) participated. Body composition, fitness and metabolic measurements were made at baseline and after a controlled 7 week exercise intervention. RESULTS: At baseline, insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was 22% lower in offspring than controls (p < 0.05), despite similar body fat and maximal oxygen uptake (.VO(2max)) values in the two groups. ISI increased by 23% (p < 0.05) in offspring following the exercise intervention, compared with 7% (NS) in the controls. Increases in .VO(2max) were similar in both groups (controls 12%, offspring 15%, p < 0.05 for both). Plasma leptin concentrations decreased significantly in the offspring (-24%, p < 0.01) but not in controls (0%, NS). Change in ISI correlated significantly with baseline ISI (r = -0.47, p < 0.0005) and change in leptin (r = -0.43, p < 0.0005). The latter relationship was not attenuated by adjustment for changes in body fat. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Offspring, but not controls, significantly increased ISI in response to an exercise intervention, indicating that insulin sensitivity is more highly modulated by physical activity in daughters of patients with type 2 diabetes than in women with no family history of the disease.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Sedentary offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes are often more insulin-resistant than persons with no family history of diabetes, but when active or fit offspring of type 2 diabeticpatients are compared with non-diabeticpersons, differences in insulin resistance are less evident. This study aimed to determine the effects of an exercise training intervention on insulin sensitivity in both groups. METHODS:Women offspring (n = 34) of type 2 diabeticpatients (offspring age 35.6 +/- 7.0 years, BMI 28.1 +/- 5.1 kg/m(2)) and 36 matched female controls (age 33.6 +/- 6.1 years, BMI 27.3 +/- 4.7 kg/m(2)) participated. Body composition, fitness and metabolic measurements were made at baseline and after a controlled 7 week exercise intervention. RESULTS: At baseline, insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was 22% lower in offspring than controls (p < 0.05), despite similar body fat and maximal oxygen uptake (.VO(2max)) values in the two groups. ISI increased by 23% (p < 0.05) in offspring following the exercise intervention, compared with 7% (NS) in the controls. Increases in .VO(2max) were similar in both groups (controls 12%, offspring 15%, p < 0.05 for both). Plasma leptin concentrations decreased significantly in the offspring (-24%, p < 0.01) but not in controls (0%, NS). Change in ISI correlated significantly with baseline ISI (r = -0.47, p < 0.0005) and change in leptin (r = -0.43, p < 0.0005). The latter relationship was not attenuated by adjustment for changes in body fat. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Offspring, but not controls, significantly increased ISI in response to an exercise intervention, indicating that insulin sensitivity is more highly modulated by physical activity in daughters of patients with type 2 diabetes than in women with no family history of the disease.
Authors: G Perseghin; T B Price; K F Petersen; M Roden; G W Cline; K Gerow; D L Rothman; G I Shulman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adamandia D Kriketos; Jerry R Greenfield; Phil W Peake; Stuart M Furler; Gareth S Denyer; John A Charlesworth; Lesley V Campbell Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: L O Ohlson; B Larsson; P Björntorp; H Eriksson; K Svärdsudd; L Welin; G Tibblin; L Wilhelmsen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 1988-11 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Sarah J Lessard; Donato A Rivas; Erin J Stephenson; Ben B Yaspelkis; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; John A Hawley Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: G Ntali; C Koutsari; K Karakike; P Makras; F Skopouli; M Mc Milan; C Slater; S Higgins; A Zampelas; D Malkova Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Young-Min Park; Jaume Padilla; Jill A Kanaley; Terese M Zidon; Rebecca J Welly; Steven L Britton; Lauren G Koch; John P Thyfault; Frank W Booth; Victoria J Vieira-Potter Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: R A Scott; C Langenberg; S J Sharp; P W Franks; O Rolandsson; D Drogan; Y T van der Schouw; U Ekelund; N D Kerrison; E Ardanaz; L Arriola; B Balkau; A Barricarte; I Barroso; B Bendinelli; J W J Beulens; H Boeing; B de Lauzon-Guillain; P Deloukas; G Fagherazzi; C Gonzalez; S J Griffin; L C Groop; J Halkjaer; J M Huerta; R Kaaks; K T Khaw; V Krogh; P M Nilsson; T Norat; K Overvad; S Panico; L Rodriguez-Suarez; D Romaguera; I Romieu; C Sacerdote; M J Sánchez; A M W Spijkerman; B Teucher; A Tjonneland; R Tumino; D L van der A; P A Wark; M I McCarthy; E Riboli; N J Wareham Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Colin N Moran; Nicholas D Barwell; Dalia Malkova; Steve J Cleland; Ian McPhee; Chris J Packard; Victor A Zammit; Jason M R Gill Journal: Metabolism Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Francis M Finucane; Jessica Horton; Lisa R Purslow; David B Savage; Soren Brage; Hervé Besson; Kenneth Horton; Ema De Lucia Rolfe; Alison Sleigh; Stephen J Sharp; Helen J Martin; Avan Aihie Sayer; Cyrus Cooper; Ulf Ekelund; Simon J Griffin; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: Amra C Alibegovic; Lise Højbjerre; Mette P Sonne; Gerrit van Hall; Bente Stallknecht; Flemming Dela; Allan Vaag Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 9.461