Literature DB >> 14698739

Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech.

Ingrid Aichert1, Wolfram Ziegler.   

Abstract

Recent accounts of the pathomechanism underlying apraxia of speech (AOS) were based on the speech production model of Levelt, Roelofs, and Meyer, and Meyer (1999)1999. The apraxic impairment was localized to the phonetic encoding level where the model postulates a mental store of motor programs for high-frequency syllables. Varley and Whiteside (2001a) assumed that in patients with AOS syllabic motor programs are no longer accessible and that these patients are required to use a subsyllabic encoding route. In this study, we tested this hypothesis by exploring the influence of syllable frequency and syllable structure on word repetition in 10 patients with AOS. A significant effect of syllable frequency on error rates was found. Moreover, apraxic errors on consonant clusters were influenced by their position relative to syllable boundaries. These results demonstrate that apraxic patients have access to the syllabary, but that they fail to retrieve the syllabic motor patterns correctly. Our findings are incompatible with a subsyllabic route model of apraxia of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14698739     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00296-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  25 in total

Review 1.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Processing of syllables in production and recognition tasks.

Authors:  Prisca Stenneken; Markus Conrad; Arthur Jacobs
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-01

3.  Age differences in the motor control of speech: An fMRI study of healthy aging.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Marc Sato; Isabelle Deschamps
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Identification and Remediation of Phonological and Motor Errors in Acquired Sound Production Impairment.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Bernadine Gagnon; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Characterizing Articulation in Apraxic Speech Using Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Christina Hagedorn; Michael Proctor; Louis Goldstein; Stephen M Wilson; Bruce Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: effects of noise masking on vowel production.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Marja-Liisa Mailend; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The effects of cognitive: linguistic variables and language experience on behavioural and kinematic performances in nonword learning.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Sanford Weisberg
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

Review 8.  Speech and nonspeech: What are we talking about?

Authors:  Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.484

9.  Inferior frontal sensitivity to common speech sounds is amplified by increasing word intelligibility.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Noam I Keren; Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Sublexical properties of spoken words modulate activity in Broca's area but not superior temporal cortex: implications for models of speech recognition.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Tepring Piquado; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.