Literature DB >> 17260187

Processing of syllables in production and recognition tasks.

Prisca Stenneken1, Markus Conrad, Arthur Jacobs.   

Abstract

Empirical evidence for a functional role of syllables in visual word processing is abundant, however it remains rather heterogeneous. The present study aims to further specify the role of syllables and the cognitive accessibility of syllabic information in word processing. The first experiment compared performance across naming and lexical decision tasks by manipulating the number of syllables in words and non-words. Results showed a syllable number effect in both the naming task and the lexical decision task. The second experiment introduced a stimulus set consisting of isolated syllabic and non-syllabic trigrams. Syllable frequency was manipulated in a naming and in a decision task requiring participants to decide on the syllabic status of letter strings. Results showed faster responses for syllables than for non-syllables in both tasks. Syllable frequency effects were observed in the decision task. In summary, the results from these manipulations of different types of syllable information confirm an important role of syllabic units in both recognition and production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17260187     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-006-9033-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  22 in total

1.  Single word production in english: the role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding.

Authors:  N O Schiller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Graphemes are perceptual reading units.

Authors:  A Rey; J C Ziegler; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-04-14

3.  Absence of syllable effects: multisyllabic [correction of monosyllabic] words are easier than monosyllabic [correction of multisyllabic] words.

Authors:  C H Lee
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2001-08

4.  Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Boris New
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-06

5.  Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: an eye-movement study.

Authors:  Florian Hutzler; Markus Conrad; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Effects of syllable frequency in speech production.

Authors:  Joana Cholin; Willem J M Levelt; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-06-06

7.  Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German.

Authors:  Markus J Hofmann; Prisca Stenneken; Markus Conrad; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?

Authors:  W J Levelt; L Wheeldon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun

10.  Frequency effects with visual words and syllables in a dyslexic reader.

Authors:  Prisca Stenneken; Markus Conrad; Florian Hutzler; Mario Braun; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.342

View more
  2 in total

1.  The syllable effect in anagram solution: unrecognised evidence from past studies.

Authors:  Steven J Muncer; David Knight
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-04

2.  InfoSyll: a syllabary providing statistical information on phonological and orthographic syllables.

Authors:  Fabienne Chetail; Stéphanie Mathey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.