Literature DB >> 14695341

Defining a 0.5-mb region of genomic gain on chromosome 6p22 in bladder cancer by quantitative-multiplex polymerase chain reaction.

Andrew J Evans1, Brenda L Gallie, Michael A S Jewett, Gregory R Pond, Kirk Vandezande, John Underwood, Yves Fradet, Gloria Lim, Paula Marrano, Maria Zielenska, Jeremy A Squire.   

Abstract

Metaphase-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has identified recurrent regions of gain on different chromosomes in bladder cancer, including 6p22. These regions may contain activated oncogenes important in disease progression. Using quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction (QM-PCR) to study DNA from 59 bladder tumors, we precisely mapped the focal region of genomic gain on 6p22. The marker STS-X64229 had copy number increases in 38 of 59 (64%) tumors and the flanking markers, RH122450 and A009N14, had copy number gains in 33 of 59 (56%) and 26 of 59 (45%) respectively. Contiguous gain was present for all three markers in 14 of 59 (24%) and for two (RH122450 and STS-X64229) in 25 of 59 (42%). The genomic distance between the markers flanking STS-X64229 is 0.5 megabases, defining the minimal region of gain on 6p22. Locus-specific interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the increased copy numbers detected by QM-PCR. Current human genomic mapping data indicates that an oncogene, DEK, is centrally placed within this minimal region. Our findings demonstrate the power of QM-PCR to narrow the regions identified by CGH to facilitate identifying specific candidate oncogenes. This also represents the first study identifying DNA copy number increases for DEK in bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14695341      PMCID: PMC1602217          DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63118-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  34 in total

1.  Distinct gene expression profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 11q23 deletion.

Authors:  Y Aalto; W El-Rifa; L Vilpo; J Ollila; B Nagy; M Vihinen; J Vilpo; S Knuutila
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Identification of numerical chromosomal changes detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of carcinoma.

Authors:  Jaudah Al-Maghrabi; Lada Vorobyova; A Toi; William Chapman; Maria Zielenska; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Subcellular localization of the human proto-oncogene protein DEK.

Authors:  F Kappes; K Burger; M Baack; F O Fackelmayer; C Gruss
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Molecular cytogenetic alterations associated with rapid tumor cell proliferation in advanced urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  S Tomovska; J Richter; K Süess; U Wagner; E Rozenblum; T C Gasser; H Moch; M J Mihatsch; G Sauter; P Schraml
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of transitional cell carcinomas of the renal pelvis.

Authors:  M A Rigola; C Fuster; C Casadevall; M Bernués; M R Caballín; A Gelabert; J Egozcue; R Miró
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2001-05

6.  Minimal regions of chromosomal imbalance in retinoblastoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  D Chen; B L Gallie; J A Squire
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2001-08

7.  Genomic amplification in retinoblastoma narrowed to 0.6 megabase on chromosome 6p containing a kinesin-like gene, RBKIN.

Authors:  Danian Chen; Sanja Pajovic; Allison Duckett; Vivette D Brown; Jeremy A Squire; Brenda L Gallie
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  High-throughput tissue microarray analysis of 3p25 (RAF1) and 8p12 (FGFR1) copy number alterations in urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  R Simon; J Richter; U Wagner; A Fijan; J Bruderer; U Schmid; D Ackermann; R Maurer; G Alund; H Knönagel; M Rist; K Wilber; M Anabitarte; F Hering; T Hardmeier; A Schönenberger; R Flury; P Jäger; J L Fehr; P Schraml; H Moch; M J Mihatsch; T Gasser; G Sauter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Detection of chromosomal imbalances in papillary bladder tumors by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  E Prat; M Bernués; M R Caballín; J Egozcue; A Gelabert; R Miró
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Sensitive and efficient detection of RB1 gene mutations enhances care for families with retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; Kirk Vandezande; Ning Chen; Katherine Zhang; Joanne Sutherland; Julie Anderson; Liping Han; Rachel Panton; Patricia Branco; Brenda Gallie
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Control of tumorigenesis and chemoresistance by the DEK oncogene.

Authors:  Erica Riveiro-Falkenbach; María S Soengas
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The DEK nuclear autoantigen is a secreted chemotactic factor.

Authors:  Nirit Mor-Vaknin; Antonello Punturieri; Kajal Sitwala; Neil Faulkner; Maureen Legendre; Michael S Khodadoust; Ferdinand Kappes; Jeffrey H Ruth; Alisa Koch; David Glass; Lilli Petruzzelli; Barbara S Adams; David M Markovitz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  DEK in the synovium of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: characterization of DEK antibodies and posttranslational modification of the DEK autoantigen.

Authors:  Nirit Mor-Vaknin; Ferdinand Kappes; Amalie E Dick; Maureen Legendre; Catalina Damoc; Seagal Teitz-Tennenbaum; Roland Kwok; Elisa Ferrando-May; Barbara S Adams; David M Markovitz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  Chromosome 6p amplification and cancer progression.

Authors:  Gda C Santos; M Zielenska; M Prasad; J A Squire
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Inactivation of the Rb pathway and overexpression of both isoforms of E2F3 are obligate events in bladder tumours with 6p22 amplification.

Authors:  C D Hurst; D C Tomlinson; S V Williams; F M Platt; M A Knowles
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Intercellular trafficking of the nuclear oncoprotein DEK.

Authors:  Anjan K Saha; Ferdinand Kappes; Amruta Mundade; Anja Deutzmann; David M Rosmarin; Maureen Legendre; Nicolas Chatain; Zeina Al-Obaidi; Barbara S Adams; Hidde L Ploegh; Elisa Ferrando-May; Nirit Mor-Vaknin; David M Markovitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Apoptosis inhibition by the human DEK oncoprotein involves interference with p53 functions.

Authors:  Trisha M Wise-Draper; Hillary V Allen; Elizabeth E Jones; Kristen B Habash; Hiroshi Matsuo; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Expression level of DEK in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is regulated by fludarabine and Nutlin-3 depending on p53 status.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Wang; Ling Liu; Lei Fan; Zhi-Jian Zou; Li-Na Zhang; Shu Yang; Jian-Yong Li; Wei Xu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  DEK expression in melanocytic lesions.

Authors:  Ferdinand Kappes; Michael S Khodadoust; Limin Yu; David S L Kim; Douglas R Fullen; David M Markovitz; Linglei Ma
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Melanoma proliferation and chemoresistance controlled by the DEK oncogene.

Authors:  Michael S Khodadoust; Monique Verhaegen; Ferdinand Kappes; Erica Riveiro-Falkenbach; Juan C Cigudosa; David S L Kim; Arul M Chinnaiyan; David M Markovitz; María S Soengas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.