Literature DB >> 23430207

Variation in nephrologist visits to patients on hemodialysis across dialysis facilities and geographic locations.

Kevin F Erickson1, Kelvin B Tan, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Jay Bhattacharya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Geographic and other variations in medical practices lead to differences in medical costs, often without a clear link to health outcomes. This work examined variation in the frequency of physician visits to patients receiving hemodialysis to measure the relative importance of provider practice patterns (including those patterns linked to geographic region) and patient health in determining visit frequency. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This work analyzed a nationally representative 2006 database of patients receiving hemodialysis in the United States. A variation decomposition analysis of the relative importance of facility, geographic region, and patient characteristics--including demographics, socioeconomic status, and indicators of health status--in explaining physician visit frequency variation was conducted. Finally, the associations between facility, geographic and patient characteristics, and provider visit frequency were measured using multivariable regression.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics accounted for only 0.9% of the total visit frequency variation. Accounting for case-mix differences, patients' hemodialysis facilities explained about 24.9% of visit frequency variation, of which 9.3% was explained by geographic region. Visit frequency was more closely associated with many facility and geographic characteristics than indicators of health status. More recent dialysis initiation and recent hospitalization were associated with decreased visit frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: In hemodialysis, provider visit frequency depends more on geography and facility location and characteristics than patients' health status or acuity of illness. The magnitude of variation unrelated to patient health suggests that provider visit frequency practices do not reflect optimal management of patients on dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23430207      PMCID: PMC3675855          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.10171012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  19 in total

1.  Frequency of physician visits to patients on in-center maintenance hemodialysis: does one strategy fit all?

Authors:  Thomas A Golper
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2004. Final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2003-11-07

3.  Changes to the nephrology monthly capitation payments in the USA.

Authors:  Linda C Upchurch
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Frequency of patient-physician contact in chronic kidney disease care and achievement of clinical performance targets.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Bernard G Jaar; Nancy E Fink; John H Sadler; Nathan W Levin; Josef Coresh; Michael J Klag; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD.

Authors:  Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden J Manns; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Mortality in end-stage renal disease is associated with facility-to-facility differences in adequacy of hemodialysis.

Authors:  W M McClellan; J M Soucie; W D Flanders
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Frequency of patient-physician contact and patient outcomes in hemodialysis care.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; John H Sadler; Andrew S Levey; Nathan W Levin; Haya R Rubin; Josef Coresh; Michael J Klag; Neil R Powe
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure.

Authors:  M W Rich; V Beckham; C Wittenberg; C L Leven; K E Freedland; R M Carney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  22 in total

1.  Effects of physician payment reform on provision of home dialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Provider Visits and Early Vascular Access Placement in Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Matthew Mell; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Evaluating the Evidence behind Policy Mandates in US Dialysis Care.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Meeting the Palliative Care Needs of Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: Beyond the Math.

Authors:  Vanessa Grubbs
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Early dialysis initiation, a look from the rearview mirror to what's ahead.

Authors:  Steven J Rosansky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Provider visit frequency and vascular access interventions in hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Matthew W Mell; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin receptor blockers vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients initiating peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Anjali B Saxena; Maria E Montez-Rath; Lynn Leng; Tara I Chang; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 8.  Palliative Care Disincentives in CKD: Changing Policy to Improve CKD Care.

Authors:  Manjula Kurella Tamura; Ann M O'Hare; Eugene Lin; Laura M Holdsworth; Elizabeth Malcolm; Alvin H Moss
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Rehospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits after Hospital Discharge in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Ziv Harel; Ron Wald; Eric McArthur; Glenn M Chertow; Shai Harel; Andrea Gruneir; Hadas D Fischer; Amit X Garg; Jeffrey Perl; Danielle M Nash; Samuel Silver; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Physician visits and 30-day hospital readmissions in patients receiving hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.