Literature DB >> 14693814

A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome.

Jelle J Goeman1, Sara A van de Geer, Floor de Kort, Hans C van Houwelingen.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: This paper presents a global test to be used for the analysis of microarray data. Using this test it can be determined whether the global expression pattern of a group of genes is significantly related to some clinical outcome of interest. Groups of genes may be any size from a single gene to all genes on the chip (e.g. known pathways, specific areas of the genome or clusters from a cluster analysis). RESULT: The test allows groups of genes of different size to be compared, because the test gives one p-value for the group, not a p-value for each gene. Researchers can use the test to investigate hypotheses based on theory or past research or to mine gene ontology databases for interesting pathways. Multiple testing problems do not occur unless many groups are tested. Special attention is given to visualizations of the test result, focussing on the associations between samples and showing the impact of individual genes on the test result. AVAILABILITY: An R-package globaltest is available from http://www.bioconductor.org

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14693814     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  447 in total

1.  Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signals.

Authors:  Ernst C Wit; David J G Bakewell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A shortcut for multiple testing on the directed acyclic graph of gene ontology.

Authors:  Garrett Saunders; John R Stevens; S Clay Isom
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Integrating genetic and gene expression evidence into genome-wide association analysis of gene sets.

Authors:  Qing Xiong; Nicola Ancona; Elizabeth R Hauser; Sayan Mukherjee; Terrence S Furey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Gene networks and haloperidol-induced catalepsy.

Authors:  O D Iancu; P Darakjian; B Malmanger; N A R Walter; S McWeeney; R Hitzemann
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Insights into colon cancer etiology via a regularized approach to gene set analysis of GWAS data.

Authors:  Lin S Chen; Carolyn M Hutter; John D Potter; Yan Liu; Ross L Prentice; Ulrike Peters; Li Hsu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 7.  The evolution of bioinformatics in toxicology: advancing toxicogenomics.

Authors:  Cynthia A Afshari; Hisham K Hamadeh; Pierre R Bushel
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  A hypothesis test for equality of bayesian network models.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2010-10-12

9.  Downregulation of the acetyl-CoA metabolic network in adipose tissue of obese diabetic individuals and recovery after weight loss.

Authors:  Harish Dharuri; Peter A C 't Hoen; Jan B van Klinken; Peter Henneman; Jeroen F J Laros; Mirjam A Lips; Fatiha El Bouazzaoui; Gert-Jan B van Ommen; Ignace Janssen; Bert van Ramshorst; Bert A van Wagensveld; Hanno Pijl; Ko Willems van Dijk; Vanessa van Harmelen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Regression modeling of allele frequencies and testing Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Jason P Sinnwell; Gregory D Jenkins
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 0.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.