Literature DB >> 22668791

Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signals.

Ernst C Wit1, David J G Bakewell.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Cancer biology is a field where the complexity of the phenomena battles against the availability of data. Often only a few observations per signal source, i.e. genes, are available. Such scenarios are becoming increasingly more relevant as modern sensing technologies generally have no trouble in measuring lots of channels, but where the number of subjects, such as patients or samples, is limited. In statistics, this problem falls under the heading 'large p, small n'. Moreover, in such situations the use of asymptotic analytical results should generally be mistrusted.
RESULTS: We consider two cancer datasets, with the aim to mine the activity of functional groups of genes. We propose a hierarchical model with two layers in which the individual signals share a common variance component. A likelihood ratio test is defined for the difference between two collections of corresponding signals. The small number of observations requires a careful consideration of the bias of the statistic, which is corrected through an explicit Bartlett correction. The test is validated on Monte Carlo simulations, which show improved detection of differences compared with other methods. In a leukaemia study and a cancerous fibroblast cell line, we find that the method also works better in practice, i.e. it gives a richer picture of the underlying biology. AVAILABILITY: The MATLAB code is available from the authors or on http://www.math.rug.nl/stat/Software. CONTACT: e.c.wit@rug.nl d.bakewell@liv.ac.uk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22668791      PMCID: PMC3400963          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  23 in total

1.  Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models.

Authors:  R D Wolfinger; G Gibson; E D Wolfinger; L Bennett; H Hamadeh; P Bushel; C Afshari; R S Paules
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data.

Authors:  M K Kerr; M Martin; G A Churchill
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Testing for differentially-expressed genes by maximum-likelihood analysis of microarray data.

Authors:  T Ideker; V Thorsson; A F Siegel; L E Hood
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 4.  Fibroblast heterogeneity: more than skin deep.

Authors:  J Michael Sorrell; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Cancer: A wolf in wolf's clothing.

Authors:  Douglas R Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Discovering molecular functions significantly related to phenotypes by combining gene expression data and biological information.

Authors:  Fátima Al-Shahrour; Ramón Díaz-Uriarte; Joaquín Dopazo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  The CD95 receptor: apoptosis revisited.

Authors:  Marcus E Peter; Ralph C Budd; Julie Desbarats; Stephen M Hedrick; Anne-Odile Hueber; M Karen Newell; Laurie B Owen; Richard M Pope; Juerg Tschopp; Harald Wajant; David Wallach; Robert H Wiltrout; Martin Zörnig; David H Lynch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Towards novel anti-cancer strategies based on cystatin function.

Authors:  Daniel Keppler
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 9.  Tumour microenvironment: laminin 332 in squamous-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Peter Marinkovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.