Dana Loomis1, Hans Kromhout. 1. Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. Dana.Loomis@unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Standard approaches to assessing exposures for epidemiologic studies tend to concentrate resources on obtaining detailed data for each study participant at the expense of characterizing within-person variability. METHODS: This paper presents some basic, generalizeable concepts concerning exposure and its variability, describes methods that can be used to analyze, describe, and understand that variability, and reviews related implications for the design and interpretation of epidemiologic studies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient attention to the balance of within- and between-person variation in exposure can reduce the efficiency of measurement efforts and attenuate estimates of exposure-disease association. Exposure variability should consequently be considered carefully in the planning, analysis, and interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Greater attention to these matters can lead to more meaningful characterization of exposure itself, and, most importantly, improve the chances that epidemiologic studies can identify and accurately characterize health hazards. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Standard approaches to assessing exposures for epidemiologic studies tend to concentrate resources on obtaining detailed data for each study participant at the expense of characterizing within-person variability. METHODS: This paper presents some basic, generalizeable concepts concerning exposure and its variability, describes methods that can be used to analyze, describe, and understand that variability, and reviews related implications for the design and interpretation of epidemiologic studies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient attention to the balance of within- and between-person variation in exposure can reduce the efficiency of measurement efforts and attenuate estimates of exposure-disease association. Exposure variability should consequently be considered carefully in the planning, analysis, and interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Greater attention to these matters can lead to more meaningful characterization of exposure itself, and, most importantly, improve the chances that epidemiologic studies can identify and accurately characterize health hazards. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Benjamin Kendzia; Beate Pesch; Dorothea Koppisch; Rainer Van Gelder; Katrin Pitzke; Wolfgang Zschiesche; Thomas Behrens; Tobias Weiss; Jack Siemiatycki; Jerome Lavoué; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Roger Stamm; Thomas Brüning Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Daniel A Axelrad; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas F Bateson; Michael DeVito; Rebecca C Dzubow; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Alicia M Frame; Karen A Hogan; Keith Houck; Michael Stewart Journal: Hum Ecol Risk Assess Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 5.190
Authors: Frank de Vocht; Igor Burstyn; Gilles Ferro; Ann Olsson; Mia Hashibe; Hans Kromhout; Paolo Boffetta Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 3.015