Literature DB >> 9381354

The anatomical basis of anal endosonography. A study in postmortem specimens.

B Gerdes1, H H Köhler, A Zielke, O Kisker, P J Barth, B Stinner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anal endosonography is an imaging modality new to the diagnostic workup of incontinence. Interpretations even of normal endosonomorphologic findings now vary considerably. The conjoined longitudinal muscle (LM), a widely ignored structure, has until recently not been fully recognized by anal endosonography. The aim of this study, therefore, was to accurately determine the normal anatomy of the anal canal and correlate it with the findings obtained by anal endosonography.
METHODS: Eight postmortem specimens of the anal canal were examined by endosonography. The findings were correlated with macroscopical dissection and gross sectional histology of the same specimens.
RESULTS: The external echogenic ring is composed of two anatomical structures: the LM and the external anal sphincter (EAS). However, during anal endosonography the LM cannot always be differentiated from the EAS. Histologically, the relation of the diameters of the LM and the EAS ranged from 0.45:1 to 1.25:1. The narrow hyperechogenic ring between the inner hypoechoic layer and the external hyperechoic ring is an artificial finding that cannot be related to a distinct anatomical structure and most likely represents a sonographic interface.
CONCLUSIONS: This study exactly outlines the relation of diameters of the conjoined longitudinal muscle and external anal sphincter for the first time. Until now, the LM has been underestimated in its dimensions. The role of such a thick muscular structure should be included in the conception of anal continence in the future. Especially in view of the fact that anal endosonography is increasingly used in the diagnostic workup of incontinence and fistula in ano, it is essential to understand the anatomical basis of endosonography. This study accurately delineates the sonomorphology of the anal muscles. When viewed in light findings reported here, endosonographic findings in diseases of the anal canal are nor based on a correct idea of the correlation between endosonomorphology and anal anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9381354     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  5 in total

1.  Correlation between gross anatomical topography, sectional sheet plastination, microscopic anatomy and endoanal sonography of the anal sphincter complex in human males.

Authors:  S Al-Ali; P Blyth; S Beatty; A Duang; B Parry; I P Bissett
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Morphology of the region anterior to the anal canal in males: visualization of the anterior bundle of the longitudinal muscle by transanal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Yasuo Nakajima; Satoru Muro; Hisayo Nasu; Masayo Harada; Kumiko Yamaguchi; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Paediatric anal endosonography.

Authors:  N M Jones; M Smilgin-Humphreys; P B Sullivan; H W Grant
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Effects of age and gender on three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography measurements: development of normal ranges.

Authors:  A M Knowles; C H Knowles; S M Scott; P J Lunniss
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Sonographic appearance of anal cushions of hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Adilijiang Aimaiti; Ma Mu Ti Jiang A Ba Bai Ke Re; Irshat Ibrahim; Hui Chen; Maimaitituerxun Tuerdi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.