Literature DB >> 14685897

Hertel exophthalmometry: reliability and interobserver variation.

Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli1, Bijan Beigi, Mohammad Mahdi Noorani, Marzieh Nojoomi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify and analyze the interobserver variation in Hertel exophthalmomety and to evaluate the impact of experience on it.
METHODS: In a population-based epidemiologic study, Hertel exophthalmometry was performed on 1063 randomly selected normal subjects (stratified sampling) by an oculoplastic attending surgeon (A) and a third-year ophthalmology resident (R). Both observers were masked to the reading of the other. The Chi-square test, two-tailed paired sample t-test, and two-tailed paired independent t-test were used to analyze the data (SPSS Release 9.0, Chicago).
RESULTS: There were 463 (43.5%) females and 600 (56.5%) males. The age ranged from 6 to 70 years (mean +/- SD = 20.3 +/- 10.9). The mean right eye protrusion was 14.8 mm for both 'A' and 'R'. The mean left eye protrusion was 14.6 mm and 14.7 mm, respectively. There was good correlation (r = 0.80) and no statistically significant difference (0.1 < P < 0.6) for the ocular protrusion values (right, left, and average) measured by 'A' and 'R'. However, the percentage agreement (within +/-1 mm limits of acceptance) was about 60%. Comparison of the first 530 subjects versus the remaining cases showed no improvement in agreement with the senior observer.
CONCLUSION: Hertel exophthalmometry is a reliable method for measuring the ocular protrusion. However, as with most clinical measures, there is a negligible interobserver variation that seems to be unavoidable.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14685897     DOI: 10.1076/orbi.22.4.239.17245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orbit        ISSN: 0167-6830


  10 in total

1.  Axial Globe Position Measurement: A Prospective Multicenter Study by the International Thyroid Eye Disease Society.

Authors:  Chad M Bingham; Jennifer A Sivak-Callcott; Matthew J Gurka; John Nguyen; Jeffery P Hogg; Steve E Feldon; Aaron Fay; Lay-Leng Seah; Diego Strianese; Vikram D Durairaj; Jimmy Uddin; Martin H Devoto; Matheson Harris; Justin Saunders; Tammy H Osaki; Audrey Looi; Livia Teo; Brett W Davies; Andrea Elefante; Sunny Shen; Tony Realini; William Fischer; Michael Kazim
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  Validation of Modified Hertel Exophthalmometer.

Authors:  Rizwana Fathima Jamal; Emmanuel Azariah; Deepak Pandyan; Ravindran Chinnaswami
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-09-11

3.  Cross-sectional computed tomography assessment of exophthalmos in comparison to clinical measurement via Hertel exophthalmometry.

Authors:  A Klingenstein; C Samel; A Garip-Kübler; C Hintschich; U G Müller-Lisse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Normal values of Hertel exophthalmometry in a Chinese Han population from Shenyang, Northeast China.

Authors:  Dan Wu; Xin Liu; Di Wu; Xin Di; Haixia Guan; Zhongyan Shan; Weiping Teng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Hertel exophthalmometer versus computed tomography scan in proptosis estimation in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.

Authors:  Na Ri Park; Jun Hyung Moon; Jeong Kyu Lee
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-02

6.  Exophthalmometry values in the Hong Kong Chinese adult population from a population-based study.

Authors:  Janice J C Cheung; Dulcia L Chang; Jonathan C Chan; Bonnie N K Choy; Kendrick C Shih; Jasper K W Wong; Alex L K Ng; Jennifer W H Shum; Michael Y Ni; Jimmy S M Lai; Gabriel M Leung; Ian Y H Wong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Measurement of proptosis using computed tomography based three-dimensional reconstruction software in patients with Graves' orbitopathy.

Authors:  Jung Huh; Sang Joon Park; Jeong Kyu Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Validation of exophthalmos magnetic resonance imaging measurements in patients with Graves' orbitopathy, compared to ophthalmometry results.

Authors:  Emilia Wnuk; Edyta Maj; Anna Jabłońska-Pawlak; Maria Jeczeń; Katarzyna Rowińska-Berman; Olgierd Rowiński
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-09-30

9.  A Comparative Study of Clinical vs. Digital Exophthalmometry Measurement Methods.

Authors:  Tháıs de Sous Pereira; Cristina Hiromi Kuniyoshi; Cristiane de Almeida Leite; Eloisa M M S Gebrim; Mário L R Monteiro; Allan C Pieroni Gonçalves
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.

Authors:  Weili Zhang; Qinying Huang; Yile Chen; Jinying Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.