Literature DB >> 14681007

Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: evidence from self-paced listening.

Gloria S Waters1, David Caplan.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the relationship between performance on standard tests of verbal working-memory and the on-line construction of syntactic form. In Experiment 1, working-memory was measured in 100 college students on a version of the Daneman and Carpenter (1980) reading-span task, and online syntactic processing was assessed using a self-paced listening task with four sentence types. In Experiment 2, working-memory was measured in 48 college students on two versions of the reading-span task and two other tests of verbal working-memory, and on-line syntactic processing was assessed using the self-paced listening task with an additional sentence type. In both experiments, there was no relationship between working-memory capacity and the increase in processing time seen for the on-line construction of syntactic form for either syntactically more complex or syntactically simpler sentences. The results indicate that the capacity of the working-memory system that is measured by standard working-memory tests does not determine the efficiency of on-line syntactic processing. They are consistent with the view that the working-memory system used for parsing is at least partially separate from that measured by traditional measures of working-memory capacity.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14681007     DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  13 in total

1.  Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

2.  Comparisons of online reading paradigms: eye tracking, moving-window, and maze.

Authors:  Naoko Witzel; Jeffrey Witzel; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-04

3.  Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Damian Birney; Graeme S Halford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

4.  Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Jörg Bahlmann; Alfred Anwander; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Role of working memory in typically developing children's complex sentence comprehension.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Beula M Magimairaj; Michelle H O'Malley
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-09

6.  Neural processing during older adults' comprehension of spoken sentences: age differences in resource allocation and connectivity.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Vanessa Troiani; Arthur Wingfield; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  A new modified listening span task to enhance validity of working memory assessment for people with and without aphasia.

Authors:  Maria V Ivanova; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  ERPs reveal atypical processing of subject versus object Wh-questions in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Baila Epstein; Arild Hestvik; Valerie L Shafer; Richard G Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-29

10.  Short-term memory, working memory, and syntactic comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  David Caplan; Jennifer Michaud; Rebecca Hufford
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.