Literature DB >> 17225512

Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.

Glenda Andrews1, Damian Birney, Graeme S Halford.   

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that the cognitive load imposed by tasks in various content domains increases with the complexity of the relational information processed. Sentence comprehension entails processing noun-verb relations to determine who did what to whom. The difficulty of object-extracted relative clause sentences might stem from the complex noun-verb relations they entail. Across three studies, participants read 16 types of object- and subject-extracted relative clause sentences at their own pace and then responded to a comprehension question for each sentence. Relational processing was assessed using a premise integration task or a Latin square task. These tasks predicted comprehension of object-relatives before and after controlling for subject-relatives. Working memory (WM) capacity was assessed using reading span or forward and backward digit span tests. WM tasks predicted comprehension of object-relatives before but not after controlling for subject-relatives. Comprehension of object-relatives relied more heavily on a domain-general capacity to process complex relations than on WM capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17225512     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  30 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes.

Authors:  Donald T Stuss; Brian Levine
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures.

Authors:  Gloria S Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

4.  Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; William H Levine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

5.  Theory of mind and relational complexity.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Graeme S Halford; Katie M Bunch; Darryl Bowden; Toni Jones
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

6.  Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  D Caplan; N Alpert; G Waters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.

Authors:  G S Halford; W H Wilson; S Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  The relationship between measures of working memory and sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  E Rochon; G S Waters; D Caplan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Young children's performance on the balance scale: the influence of relational complexity.

Authors:  Graeme S Halford; Glenda Andrews; Cherie Dalton; Christine Boag; Tracey Zielinski
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2002-04

10.  Increased bilateral occipitoparietal activity during retention of binary versus unary indexed lists in pair recognition.

Authors:  Steven Phillips; Kazuhisa Niki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  9 in total

1.  Belief-based and analytic processing in transitive inference depends on premise integration difficulty.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  The Potential of a Relational Training Intervention to Improve Older Adults' Cognition.

Authors:  Michelle E Kelly
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2020-07-01

3.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Clitic pronouns reveal the time course of processing gender and number in a second language.

Authors:  Eleonora Rossi; Judith F Kroll; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Planning following stroke: a relational complexity approach using the tower of london.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Graeme S Halford; Mark Chappell; Annick Maujean; David H K Shum
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Genetic basis of a cognitive complexity metric.

Authors:  Narelle K Hansell; Graeme S Halford; Glenda Andrews; David H K Shum; Sarah E Harris; Gail Davies; Sanja Franic; Andrea Christoforou; Brendan Zietsch; Jodie Painter; Sarah E Medland; Erik A Ehli; Gareth E Davies; Vidar M Steen; Astri J Lundervold; Ivar Reinvang; Grant W Montgomery; Thomas Espeseth; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; John M Starr; Nicholas G Martin; Stephanie Le Hellard; Dorret I Boomsma; Ian J Deary; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resolving Conflicts Between Syntax and Plausibility in Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Jessica E Ogden; Graeme S Halford
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

8.  Generating distant analogies facilitates relational integration: Intermediary role of relational mindset and cognitive load.

Authors:  Xuesong Du; Pei Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-13

9.  Three-year-olds' theories of mind are symbolic but of low complexity.

Authors:  Graeme S Halford; Glenda Andrews
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.